Pedagogical review
RU EN






Today: 14.05.2025
Home Search
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Issues
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted article
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
EBSCO
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Search

- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

    #SearchDownloads
    1

    Focus group as a research method in the classroom for studying tasks with multicomponent drawings // Pedagogical Review. 2024. Issue 3 (55). P. 54-63

    The article considers the disclosure of the meta-subject essence and significance of tasks with multicomponent drawings in the professional training of students of an educational organization of secondary vocational education based on the results of work in focus groups of students and undergraduates. As a result, the concepts are clarified: “multicomponent drawings”, “tasks with multicomponent drawings”, and also the requirements for tasks with multicomponent drawings and criteria for their classifications are determined. The paper highlights and characterizes 5 stages of work in focus groups; the recorded facts about the use of tasks with multicomponent drawings in the educational process of a technical school and university are described; multicomponent drawings are considered as a way of encoding educational information that stimulates the work of both hemispheres of the brain, allowing you to create non-verbalized images necessary for completing tasks. The tasks under consideration are defined as a synthesis of visual supports and a text field, taking into account the “clip thinking” of a modern student, contributing to the formation of meta-subject results and the emergence of ideas in the form of mental images necessary for successful mastery of competencies within the framework of the profession or specialty received by the student.

    Keywords: focus group, research method, tasks with multicomponent drawings, meta-subject results, secondary vocational education, “clip” thinking, “visual” thinking

    718

    © 2025 Pedagogical Review

    Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU