INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND METHODS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT SUBJECTIVITY
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2019-3-35-40
This article reveals the essence of interactive teaching methods that contribute to the development of students’ subjectivity, as one of the ways to implement modern tasks of preparing future teachers. The author’s definition of the concept of student subjectivity is given. The subjectness of the student in this work is considered as an integrative personal quality, which is characterized by the activity of the student, primarily internal focus on himself, that is, the definition of goals, objectives, the formation of motives, etc., as well as focus on the outside world, which is determined to be ready right decisions in non-standard life situations. The author describes the main interactive methods used in the practice of teaching: the Workshop of the Future method, the case-study method, the Decision Tree method, the teaching discussion. The author believes that the Workshop of the Future method contributes to the revitalization of the educational process, develops motivation for learning, forms an assessment of the level of preparedness of students and the degree of proficiency in the material; the case-study method teaches us to analyze the situation, contributes to the development of the ability to identify key issues, choose the right solutions and formulate a sequence of actions; the Decision Tree method develops creative thinking, forms the ability of the student to predict the expected result and, if necessary, make adjustments on their own; study discussion develops personal and professional qualities, the ability to reasonably defend their opinions, contributes to the development of skills to conduct business communication and public speaking. Also in the article, the author revealed the goal of interactive learning, which is to create a comfortable learning environment in which each student can feel their success and intellectual integrity, which will allow him to simulate life and professional situations from teaching practice, find a solution based on an analysis of circumstances and the corresponding situation; to contribute to the formation of professional skills and abilities, to cultivate humanistic values in him, to contribute to creating an atmosphere of interaction and cooperation.
Keywords: student subjectivity, interactive learning, interactive teaching methods, Future Workshop method, case-study method, Decision Tree method, educational discussion
References:
1. Gosudarstvennaya programma razvitiya obrazovaniya Respubliki Kazakhstan na 2011–2020 gody [State program for the development of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2011–2020 years] (in Kazakh). URL: http://control.edu.gov.kz/ru/gosudarstvennaya-programma-razvitiya-obrazovaniya-na-2011-2020-gody (accessed 23 January 2019).
2. Kaykenova Zh. K. Interaktivnyye formy i metody obucheniya gosudarstvennykh sluzhashchikh: uchebno-metodicheskoye posobiye [Interactive forms and methods of teaching civil servants: teaching aid]. Astana, 2008. 201 р. (in Kazakh).
3. Rodzhers K. Stanovleniye lichnosti. Vzglyad na psikhoterapiyu [The formation of personality. A look at psychotherapy]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1994. 480 p. (in Russian).
4. Derkach A. A. Professional’naya sub’’yektnost’ kak psikhologo-akmeologicheskiy fenomen [Professional subjectivity as a psychological and acmeological phenomenon]. Akmeologiya – Acmeology, 2015, no. 4 (56), pp. 9–19 (in Russian).
5. Kashlev S. S. Pedagogicheskiye usloviya razvitiya sub’’ektnosti studenta v pedagogicheskom protsesse vuza [Pedagogical conditions for the development of student subjectivity in the pedagogical process of the university]. Materialy Vtoroy respublikanskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Universitetskoye obrazovaniye: ot effektivnogo prepodavaniya k effektivnomu obucheniyu” (Minsk, 1–3 marta 2001 g.). Belorusskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet. Tsentr problem razvitiya obrazovaniya [Materials of the Second Republican Scientifi c-Practical Conference “University Education: from Effective Teaching to Effective Learning” (Minsk, March 1–3, 2001). Belarusian State University. Center for Educational Development]. Minsk, Propiley Publ., 2002. Pp. 95–102 (in Belarusian).
6. Kariyev A. D. Predstavleniye sub’’ektnosti cheloveka: uchet napravlennosti [Representation of human subjectivity: consideration of orientation]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya, 2019, no. 1 (74), pp. 90–91 (in Russian).
7. Berkenova G. S. Interaktivnoye obucheniye kak usloviye sovershenstvovaniya professional’noy podgotovki spetsialistov v vuze [Interactive learning as a condition for improving the training of specialists in the university]. Vestnik Karagandinskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika – Bulletin of University of Karaganda. Series: Pedagogy, 2011, no. 3, pp. 65–71 (in Kazakh).
8. Imraziyeva S. D. Interaktivnyye tekhnologii obucheniya [Interactive learning technologies]. Professional Kazakhstana – Professional Kazakhstan, 2009, no. 8, pp. 63–64 (in Kazakh).
9. Rysbayeva A. K. Interaktivnoye obucheniye kak faktor uspeshnoy uchebnoy deyatel’nosti studentov [Interactive learning as a factor in successful educational activities of students]. Vestnik KazNPU imeni Abaya. Seriya: Pedagogicheskiye nauki – Khabarshy-Vestnik. Series: Pedagogical Sciences, 2007, no. 4, pp. 26–29 (in Kazakh).
10. Tursunova B. Zh. Interaktivnyye tekhnologii obucheniya v vysshey shkole [Interactive technologies of higher education]. Aktual’nyye problemy sovremennosti. Seriya: Pedagogika, 2008, no. 17, pp. 74–77 (in Kazakh).
( 409.64 kB ) 
( 403.68 kB )
Issue: 3, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: PEDAGOGY OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Pages: 35 — 40
Downloads: 1016