IMPROVEMENT OF THE LANGUAGE TRAINING SYSTEM WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE BOLOGNA PROCESS IMPLEMENTATION AT A NON-LINGUISTIC UNIVERSITY
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2019-5-75-82
The article is devoted to the influence of the Bologna process on the system of Russian education. For the last decade there has been a massive transfer of higher education to a twolevel system: bachelor – master. To obtain a bachelor’s degree, you must complete 4–5 years of training, masters are to study additional 1–2 years. A single-level system with obtaining the qualification “specialist” remains for some professions and areas of education. The reason for the transition to this model of education was Russia’s accession to the Bologna process in September 2003 at the Berlin meeting of European ministers of education. It should be noted that the reformation process was fully justified and we expect, since the optimization of such spheres of the state’s life as political, economic and social should have led to changes in the field of education. The article focuses on the difficulties appeared in non- linguistic universities in connection with the transition to a two-level education system and a significant reduction in hours of foreign language. We propose ways for solution of these problems, allowing students to master strategies, develop personal knowledge, interact with other subjects of the educational process and with the world as a whole. The introduction of modular training, the use of tests in the learning process will make it possible to coordinate the program of teaching foreign languages with a general curriculum, increase the competitive ability of Russian graduates and their level of professional training, and also organize turnout of highly qualified specialists with relevant skills for studying in European universities.
Keywords: foreign language competence, Bologna process, non-linguistic university, two-level system of education, module training, linguo-didactic test
References:
1. Nikolayev D. V., Suslova D. V. Rossiya v Bolonskom protsesse [Russia in the Bologna process]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Education Studies Moscow, 2010, no. 1, pp. 1–17 (in Russian).
2. Vlasova E. M. Problemy perekhoda rossiyskogo obshchestva k dvukhurovnevoy sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya [Problems of transition of the Russian society to a two-level system of higher education]. Teorija i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya – Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2014, no.1, pp. 89–93 (in Russian).
3. Baydenko V. I. Bolonskiy protsess: problemy, opyt, resheniya [Bologna Process: problems, experience, solutions]. Moscow, Issledovatel’skiy tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov Publ., 2006. 112p. (in Russian).
4. Tyugashev E. A. Filosofi ya bolonskogo protsessa [Philosophy of the Bologna Process] (in Russian). URL: https://refdb.ru/look/2377015-pall.html (accessed 24 December 2018).
5. Lukichev G. A. Obrszovaniye stran Evropeyskogo soyuza ustremleno v budushcheye [The education of European Union countries is directed towards the future] (in Russian). URL: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/2011/05/06/1268034550/13lukichev166-177.pdf (accessed 24 December 2018).
6. Vakhshtayn V. S. Dve modeli obrazovatel’nykh sistem: kontinental’naya i atlanticheskaya [Two models of educational systems: continental and atlantic] (in Russian). URL: www.interlos.ru/321-352 (accessed 26 December 2018).
7. Aleksandrova E. V. Informativno-osoznannyy podkhod v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya: istoki, sushchnost’, perspektivy [Informative-conscious approach in the system of higher education: sources, essence, perspectives: monograph]. Samara, SamGUPS Publ., 2016. 135 p. (in Russian).
8. Obrazovaniye v tsifrakh: 2018 [Education in numbers: 2018] (in Russian). URL: https://www.hse.ru/primarydata/oc2018 (accessed 29 December 2018).
9. Aziattseva T. V. Didakticheskiye osobennosti obucheniya inostrannomu yazyku studentov neyazykovykh fakul’tetov vuzov [Didactic peculiarities of teaching foreign languages to the students of non-linguistic departments]. Prepodavatel’ XXI vek, 2015, vol. 3, pp. 162–169 (in Russian).
10. Dikova E. S. Novye podkhody k postanovke tseli obucheniya inostrannym yazykam v neyazykovom vuze [New approaches to determining of linguistic training objective in non-linguistic university]. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of the Buryat State University, 2009, no.15, pp.163–167 (in Russian).
11. Samarskiy gosudarstvennyy meditsinskiy universitet. Obrazovatel’naya sreda [Samara State Medical University. Educational Environment] (in Russian). URL: http://www.samsmu.ru (accessed 10 December 2018).
12. Samarskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet putey soobshcheniya. Lokal’nye akty [Samara State Transport University. Local acts] (in Russian). URL: https://www.samgups.ru/sveden/education/formy-obucheniya-normativnye-sroki-obucheniya/vpo_old/lokalnye-akty/ (accessed 10 December 2018).
13. Tsaregorodtseva T. I. Teoriya i tekhnologiya modul’nogo obucheniya [Theory and technology of modular learning]. Moscow, MSLU Publ., 1996. 302 p. (in Russian).
14. Shchednova T. N. Realizatsiya modul’no-reytingovoy sistemy obucheniya matematike studentov agrarnogo vuza. Avtoref. dis. kand. ped nauk [The implementation of a modular rating system for teaching mathematics to students of an agricultural university. Diss. cand. ped. sci.]. Omsk, 2003. 23p. (in Russian).
15. Jucjavichene P. A. Teoriya i praktika modul’nogo obucheniya [Theory and practice of modular teaching]. Kaunas, Shviesa Publ., 1989. 271 p. (in Russian).
16. Barbasheva S. S. Obucheniye delovomu angliyskomu yazyku turisticheskogo profi lya pri uglublennom ovladenii yazykom v starshikh klassakh. Dis. kand. ped. nauk [Teaching of business English of a tourist specialization with in-depth language acquisition in high school. Diss. kand. ped. sci.]. Moscow, 2007. 228p. (in Russian).
17. Aleksandrova E. V., Aleksandrov E. V. Osobennosti razrabotki mul’timediynykh posobiy v ramkah distsiplin gumanitarnogo i tekhnicheskogo tsiklov dlya studentov zheleznodorozhnykh spetsial’nostey [Features of the development of multimedia manuals in the disciplines of the humanities and technical cycles for students of railway specialties]. Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: pedagogika i psikhologiya – ARS: Pedagogy and Psychology, 2018, vol. 7, no. 3 (24), pp. 13–16 (in Russian).
18. Kokotta V. A. Lingvodidakticheskoye testirovaniye: nauch.-teoret. posobiye [Linguo-didactic testing: scientifi c. theor. manual]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1989. 127 p. (in Russian).
19. Guzmán E., Conejo R., García-Hervás E. An authoring environment for adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 2005, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 66–76.
20. Lilley M., Barker T. An Evaluation of a Computer-Adaptive Test in a UK University context. Proceedings of the 7th Computer-Assisted Assessment Conference. Loughborough University, United Kingdom, 2003, pp. 171–182.
21. Aleksandrova E. V. Testovyy kontrol’ v sisteme inoyazychnogo obrazovaniya [Test control in the system of foreign language education]. Nauka i obrazovaniye transportu. Vyp. 1 [Science and education for transport. Vol. 1]. Samara, 2014, Pp. 349–351 (in Russian).
( 435.69 kB ) 
( 428.26 kB )
Issue: 5, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: PEDAGOGY OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Pages: 75 — 82
Downloads: 797