EMOTIONAL, COGNITIVE AND SOCIAL FACTORS RELATING TO THE EFFICIENCY OF SOLVING SPATIAL TASKS
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2020-3-201-207
Psychologists are interested in the study of spatial and general cognitive abilities. Known that they can predict success in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) areas. Nevertheless, a comprehensive study of the influence of various factors on spatial abilities was not held. To examine the factors that can be associated with solving spatial problems, the study was conducted on a Russian-language sample, which included 161 young men and women from different study majors (STEM and non-STEM). Studied factors were emotional, cognitive and social. A feature of the study is that a comprehensive examination of factors was carried out in the study of spatial tasks such as “Mechanical reasoning and spatial relations”, “Paper folding”, “Pattern assembly”, “Shape rotation”. As a result of the regression analysis (with the inclusion of all the studied factors), it turned out that for each spatial problem the presented models were significant. All models have the same percentage of explained variance are approximately 20%. Non-verbal intelligence makes a great contribution to “Mechanical reasoning and spatial relations” and “Shape rotation”, and also for non-verbal intelligence, working memory, and the direction of learning make a great contribution to “Pattern assembly” and “Paper folding”. Emotional and social factors were not significant. Findings will enable a better understanding of what contributes to spatial abilities.
Keywords: spatial abilities, STEM, individual differences, spatial anxiety, working memory, intelligence, gender stereotype
References:
1. Ramirez G., Gunderson E. A., Levine S. C., Beilock S. L. Spatial anxiety relates to spatial abilities as a function of working memory in children. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2012, vol. 65 (3), pp. 474–487. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.616214.
2. Sorby S., Veurink N., Streiner S. Does spatial skills instruction improve STEM outcomes? The answer is ‘yes’. Learning and Individual Differences, 2018, vol. 67, pp. 209–222. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.09.001.
3. Petersen J., Hyde J. S. Gender-related academic and occupational interests and goals. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 2014, vol. 47, pp. 43–76. DOI: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2014.04.004.
4. Schweizer K., Goldhammer F., Rauch W., Moosbrugger H. On the validity of Raven’s Matrices Test: does spatial ability contribute to performance? Personality and Individual Differences, 2007, vol. 43 (8), pp. 1998–2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.008.
5. Malanchini M., Rimfeld K., Shakeshaft N. G., Rodic M., Schofield K., Selzam S., Dale P. S., Petrill S. A., Kovas Y. The genetic and environmental aetiology of spatial, mathematics and general anxiety. Scientific reports, 2017, vol. 7 (1), 42218. DOI: 10.1038/srep42218.
6. Hausmann M. Arts versus science – Academic background implicitly activates gender stereotypes on cognitive abilities with threat raising men’s (but lowering women’s) performance. Intelligence, 2014, vol. 46, pp. 235–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2014.07.004.
7. Colom R., Rebollo I., Palacios A., Juan-Espinosa M., Kyllonen P. C. Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g. Intelligence, 2004, vol. 32 (3), pp. 277–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2003.12.002.
8. Süb H. M., Oberauer K., Wittman W. W., Wilhelm O., Schulze R. Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability-and a little bit more. Intelligence, 2002, vol. 30 (3), pp. 261–288. DOI: 10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00100-3.
9. Ackerman P. L., Beier M. E., Boyle M. O. Working Memory and Intelligence: The Same or Different Constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 2005, vol. 131 (1), pp. 30–60. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30.
10. Passolunghi M. C., Caviola S., De Agostini R., Perin C., Mammarella I. C. Mathematics Anxiety, Working Memory, and Mathematics Performance in Secondary-School Children. Frontiers in psychology, 2016, vol. 7. 42. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00042.
11. Doyle R. A., Voyer D. Stereotype manipulation effects on math and spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 2015, vol. 47, pp. 103–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.018.
12. Löwe B., Decker O., Müller S., Brähler E., Schellberg D., Herzog W., Herzberg P. Y. Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Medical care, 2008, vol. 46 (3), pp. 266–274. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318160d093.
13. Lawton C. A. Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex roles, 1994, vol. 30, pp. 765–779.
14. Raven J. Raven progressive matrices. London, 2003. P. 223–237.
15. Maslennikova E. P., Feklicheva I. V., Esipenko E. A., Sharafiyeva K. R., Ismatullina V. I., Golovin G. V., Miklashevskiy A. A., Chipeyeva N. A., Soldatova E. L Slovarnyy zapas kak pokazatel’ verbal’nogo intellekta: primeneniye ekspress-metodiki otsenki slovarnogo zapasa [Vocabulary Size as a Verbal Intelligence Index: Application of the Express Methods of an Estimating Vocabulary Size]. Vestnik YUUrGU. Seriya «Psikhologiya» – Bulletin of the South Ural State University Series “Psychology”, 2017, vol. 10 (3), pp. 63–69 (in Russian). DOI: 10.14529/psy170306.
16. Mueller S. T., Piper B. J. The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL Test Battery. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2014, vol. 222, pp. 250–259.
17. Rimfeld K., Shakeshaft N. G., Malanchini M., Rodic M., Selzam S., Schofield K., Plomin R. Phenotypic and genetic evidence for a unifactorial structure of spatial abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, vol. 114 (10), pp. 2777–2782.
18. Hinze S. R., Williamson V. M., Shultz M. J., Williamson K. C., Deslongchamps G., Rapp D.N. When do spatial abilities support student comprehension of STEM visualizations? Cognitive Processing, 2013, vol. 14, pp. 129–142. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-013-0539-3.
( 372.14 kB ) 
( 363.48 kB )
Issue: 3, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 201 — 207
Downloads: 859