INTERDISCIPLINARITY AS THE BASIS OF INTEGRITY OF THE PROCESS OF TEACHING DECORATIVE AND APPLIED ARTS
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2020-4-124-130
The article is devoted to the identification of ways to improve professional training of artists of decorative and applied arts in the system of higher education. The reasons for the lack of understanding of theoretical and practical knowledge by students have been identified, among which the most significant problem is the absence of interprandial links between educational subjects. A variety of associative and dissociative connections in the vision of the same object or phenomenon have been proven to be a leading sign of understanding that forms sustainable systemic knowledge. Possibilities of using the methods of «discourse» and «interpretation» in mastering the content of the training course «Cultural studies» and the cycle of professional disciplines aimed at mastering the principles of design of applied arts and their materialization are identified. It is shown that discourse, as an analytical process and method of cognition, mediated by artistic-shaped perception and intuition, activates reclusive dialogue, development of alternative options, critical analysis of its actions, formulates assessment judgements and author ‘s reflexion, as necessary qualities of the artist-applied, capable of selfknowledge and self-development. The method of «interpretation» deepens the understanding of signs, symbols and meanings in the context of their professional activities. The conditions for the use of the designated methods in the educational process of the university have been identified and justified. It is concluded that interprandial ties in the teaching of decorative and applied arts intensify the holistic understanding of knowledge and increase the possibilities of their application in new situations, encouraging independence and personal self-realization.
Keywords: technique of training in arts and crafts, intersubject communications, cultural science, methods of «discourse» and «interpretation»
References:
1. Koreshkov V. V. Rol’ obrazovatel’noy oblasti «Iskusstvo» v vospitanii molodezhi [Role of educational area “Art” in youth education]. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya kul’tury, iskusstva i obrazovaniya [Modern trends in the development of cul-ture, art and education]. Moscow, Pero Publ., 2017, pp. 178–186 (in Russian).
2. Kuimova E. I., Kuimova K. A., Yachinova S. N. Mezhpredmetnye svyazi kak sredstvo povysheniya kachestva obucheniya v vysshey shkole [Interprandial linkages as a means of improving the quality of higher education]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya – Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2015, no. 2, pp. 506–509 (in Russian).
3. Samarin Yu. A. Ocherki psikhologii uma: osobennosti umstvennoy deyatel’nosti shkol’nikov: pod red. G. A. Netsenko, Z. G. Naydenovoy. 2-e izd., ispr. [Essays of the Psychology of Mind: Features of Mental Activity of Schoolchildren. Under Ed. G. A. Netsenko, Z. G. Naydenovoy. 2nd Ed.]. Gatchina, Leningr. obl. in-t ekonomiki i finansov. Publ., 2003. 318 p. (in Russian).
4. Cole. M. Kul’tura v kontekste mezhdistsiplinarnykh nauchnykh issledovaniy v oblasti obrazovaniya (per. s angl. S. Kuchkovskoy) [Culture in the context of interdisciplinary academic research in education]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies, 2011, no. 3, pp. 138–163 (in Russian).
5. Zinchenko V. G. Mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya. Ot sistemnogo podkhoda k sinergeticheskoy paradigme [Intercultural Communication. From a systemic approach to a synergistic paradigm]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2007. 224 p. (in Russian).
6. Bakhtin M. M. Problema teksta v lingvistike, filologii i drugikh gumanitarnykh naukakh [Problem of text in linguistics, philology and other humanities]. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow, 1979. 423 p. (in Russian).
7. Stein S. Yu. Metodologiya v iskusstvovedenii [Methodology in Art History]. Dekorativnoye iskusstvo i predmetnoprostranstvennaya sreda. Vestnik MGHPA. 2017, no. 4, pp. 32–46 (in Russian).
8. Lysenko S. Yu. Osobennosti izucheniya problem khudozhestvennoy interpretatsii v muzyke v vuze kul’tury [Peculiarities of studying problems of artistic interpreta-tion in music in the university of culture]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye segodnya – Higher Education in Russia, 2018, no. 7, pp. 124–129. (in Russian).
9. Privalova V. M. Znakovo-simvolicheskaya pragmatika kak osnova ritualov kul’tury [Sign-symbolic pragmatics as the basis of rituals of culture]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra – Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 6, pp. 83–91 (in Russian).
10. Berulava M. N. Integratsiya soderzhaniya obrazovaniya [Integration of educational content]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1993. 172 p. (in Russian).
( 361.61 kB ) 
( 353.02 kB )
Issue: 4, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: INNOVATIVE PROCESSES IN EDUCATION
Pages: 124 — 130
Downloads: 694