ESSENCE AND CONTENT OF META-SUBJECT APPROACH IN PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCE AND FEDERAL STATE EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2020-5-41-50
The meta-subject approach was introduced into the system of primary general education in 2010. However, until now there is no officially accepted definition of the term “metasubject content”. The purpose of this study was to reveal the essence and content of the metasubject approach, aimed at ensuring the raise of the subjective cognitive activity of students to the over-subject level. For this aim the author of the article studied the positions of leading scientific schools on the meta-subject content of general education, meta-subject competences and the meta-subject approach as a whole, made a content analysis of the key concepts, correlated the positions of representatives of leading scientific schools on a meta-subject approach with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard, and formulated own position on system-forming concepts. The meta-subject content of general education is a totality of over-subject didactic units (“meta-subjects”, “primary meanings”), as well as methods of conducting meta-subject cognitive activity. Meta-subject results consist of metasubject knowledge, universal learning activities and meta-subject competencies. Meta-subject knowledge refers to knowledge of a higher level of abstraction compared to subject knowledge related to one subject area. Meta-subject knowledge can be obtained only through a combination of knowledge from several subject areas. The author formulated his own definition of meta-subject competencies: meta-subject competencies are the learner’s integrative abilities to learn meta-subject knowledge based on correlation of knowledge from several subject areas, as well as to form universal educational actions based on a combination of different methods of conducting meta-subject cognitive activity from several areas (cognitive, regulatory, communicative).
Keywords: meta-subject approach, principle of combination, meta-subject content, meta-subject results, meta-subject competencies
References:
1. PolonskyV. M. Bol’shoy tematicheskiy slovar’ po obrazovaniyu i pedagogike [A large thematic dictionary of education and pedagogy]. Moscow, Narodnoye obrazovaniye Publ., 2017. 158 p. (in Russian).
2. Yalalov F. G. Professional’naya mnogomernost’: mnogomernye kompetentsii [Professional multidimensionality: multidimensional competences]. Filologija i kul’tura – Philology and Culture, 2015, no. 2 (40), pp. 326–329 (in Russian).
3. Dorofeyev A. V. Mnogomernaya matematicheskaya podgotovka budushchego pedagoga. Dis. … dokt. ped. nauk [Multidimensional mathematical training of the future teacher. Diss. doct. of ped. sci.]. Kazan, 2011. 394 p. (in Russian).
4. Yalalov F. G., Shen Pingxia, Gromova C. R., Zakirova V. G. Educational Technology as a Video Сases in teaching Psychology for Future Teachers. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2017, no. 13 (7), pp. 3417–3429. URL: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00736a. (accessed 16 February 2020).
5. Publikatsii Tsentra otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya ISRO RAO po itogam mezhdunarodnykh issledovaniy TIMSS, PISA, PIRLS [Publications of the Institute for Education Development Strategy of Russian Academy of Education about the results of international studies of TIMSS, PISA, PIRLS] (in Russian). URL: http: //www.centeroko.ru/public.html (accessed 24 January 2020).
6. Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart nachal’nogo obshchego obrazovaniya (utv. Prikazom Ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki RF ot 6 oktyabrya 2009 g. no. 373) [The Federal State Educational Standard for Primary General Education (approved by the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of October 6, 2009 N 373)] (in Russian). URL: https://base.garant.ru/197127/53f89421bbdaf741eb2d1ecc4ddb4c33/ (accessed 20 January 2020).
7. Gromyko N. V. Metapredmet “Znaniye”: uchebnoye posobiye [Metasubject “Knowledge”: Textbook]. Moscow, Pushkin Institute Publ., 2001. 544 p. (in Russian).
8. Gromyko Yu. V. Mysledeyatel’nostnaya pedagogika (teoretiko-prakticheskoye rukovodstvo po osvoyeniyu vysshikh obraztsov pedagogicheskogo iskusstva) [Thought-activity pedagogy (theoretical and practical guide to mastering the highest examples of pedagogical art)]. Minsk, 2000. 376 p. (in Russian).
9. RepkinV. V., Repkina N. V. Chto takoye razvivayushcheye obucheniye: vzglyad iz proshlogo v budushcheye [What is developmental education: a look from the past to the future]. Moscow, Nekommercheskoye partnerstvo “Avtorskiy Klub” Publ., 2018. 152 p. (in Russian).
10. Borovskikh A. V., Rozov N. H. Nadpredmetnoye soderzhaniye shkol’nogo obrazovaniya [Over-subject content of school education]. Pedagogika, 2014, no. 1, pp. 3–14 (in Russian).
11. Khutorskoy A. V. Kompetentnostnyy podkhod v obuchenii. Nauchno-metodicheskoye posobiye [Competencybased approach to learning. Scientific and methodological manual]. Moscow, Eydos; Institute for Human Education Publ., 2013. 73 p. (in Russian). URL: https://www.khutorskoy.ru/books/2013/compet/index.htm (accessed 21 January 2020).
12. Borovskikh A. V. Istina protiv zakona, ili Eshche raz o kompetentnosti [Truth against the law, or once again about competence]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 20: Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye – The Moscow University Bulletin. Series 20. Pedagogical Education, 2018, no. 2, pp. 12–33 (in Russian).
13. Yarovaya E. A. O metapredmetnyh kompetentsiyakh i ikh vidakh [About meta-subject competencies and their types]. Nauchnyye trudy SWorld [Scientific works of SWorld]. Ivanovo, 2015, vol. 6, no. 3 (40). Pp. 66–71 (in Russian) URL: https://www.sworld.com.ua/konfer40/126.pdf (accessed 24 January 2020).
14. Kolmakova V. I. Formy vneurochnoy raboty, napravlennye na razvitiye metapredmetnyh kompetentsiy uchashchikhsya [Forms of extracurricular activities aimed at developing meta-subject competencies of students] (in Russian). URL: http://u4eba.net/sbornikidei/formyi-vneurochnoy-rabotyi-napravlennyie-na-razvitie-metapredmetnyih-kompetentsiy-uchashhihsya.html (accessed 24 January 2020).
15. Kruze B. A., Eremeyeva E.V. Opredeleniye ponyatiya metapredmetnykh kompetentsiy mladshego shkol’nika [The notion of meta-subject competences of primary school students]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya – Modern problems of science and education, 2013, no. 6 (in Russian). URL: http://www.science-education.ru/en/article/view?id=11014 (accessed 24 January 2020).
16. Potashnik M. M., Levit M. V. Kak pomoch’ uchitelyu v osvoyenii FGOS. Metodicheskoye posobiye [How to help the teacher in the development of FSES]. Moscow, Pedagogicheskoye obshchestvo Rossii Publ., 2014. 320 p. (in Russian).
17. Gelyasina E. V. Opredeleniye soderzhatel’nogo napolneniya metapredmetnykh kompetentsiy: opyt Belarusi [Definition of substantiv filling of meta-subject competences: the experience of Belarus]. Deyatel’nostnaya pedagogika i pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye: sbornik dokladov uchastnikov IV Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii DPPO-2016. Pod redaktsiyey A. V. Borovskikh [Active pedagogy and pedagogical education. Proceedings of participants of 4thInternational Conference. Voronezh, 9–13 September 2016. Borovskikh A. V. (Ed.)]. Moscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2017. Pp. 27–36 (in Russian).
18. Yalalov F. G. Mnogomernost’ soderzhaniya professional’nogo obrazovaniya [Multidimensionality of the content of vocational education]. Vestnik Adygeyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Pedagogika i psikhologiya – Bulletin of the Adygea State University. Series 3: Pedagogy and Psychology, 2015, no. 1 (157), pp. 126–131 (in Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23562662 (accessed 24 January 2020).
( 635.59 kB ) 
( 615.64 kB )
Issue: 5, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: GENERAL EDUCATION
Pages: 41 — 50
Downloads: 966