ON THE PROBLEM OF INVOLVING TEACHERS IN RESEARCH ACTIVITIES
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2021-1-92-96
The question is raised about how to involve teachers of a pedagogical University in research activities and apply the results of this activity in the educational process of the University. It is shown how involvement as the highest manifestation of human subjectivity differs from activity. Two levels of involvement are identified: the level of participation in the activity and the level of influence on its content, course and results. The author substantiates the difficulties that arise for a teacher who tries to continue studying science after defending his dissertation. This is a contradiction between a high degree of research freedom and autonomy, on the one hand, and the need for responsibility and self-organization in research search, on the other. The factors that determine involvement in research are highlighted: research “vigilance”, participation in educational innovations and studying their effects, constant feedback from the teacher with students to adjust professional tests and enhance their educational results. The author draws attention to the fact that one’s own research trajectory can be interpreted as a kind of educational trajectory of a University teacher. It is concluded that it is necessary and possible for teachers to influence the formation of a relevant scientific agenda for them and thereby enrich the educational content of professional training of future teachers.
Keywords: participation and influence, educational innovation, trial action, feedback
References:
1. Prozumentova G. N. Pedagogika sovmestnoy deyatel’nosti: smyslovye konteksty i obrazovatel’naya real’nost’ [Pedagogy of joint activity: semantic contexts and educational reality]. Shkola sovmestnoy deyatel’nosti: razrabotka obrazovatel’nykh programm v razvivayushcheysya shkole [School of joint activity: developing educational programs in a developing school]. Tomsk, Del’taplan Publ., 2002. Vol. 5. Pp. 4–16 (in Russian).
2. Shlyaykher А. Obrazovaniye mirovogo urovnya. Kak vystroit’ shkol’nuyu sistemu XXI veka? [World-class education. How to build a 21st-century school system? Translated from English by I. S. Denisenko, I. Yu. Oblachko]. Moscow, Natsional’noye obrazovaniye Publ., 2019. 336 p. (in Russian).
3. Efendiyev А. G., Reshetnikova K. V. Professional’naya deyatel’nost’ prepodavateley rossiyskikh vuzov: problemy i osnovnye tendentsii [Professional Activity of Russian University Teachers: Problems and Basic Trends]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies Moscow, 2008, no. 1, pp. 87–119 (in Russian).
4. Pozdeeva S. I. Prepodavatel’ vysshey shkoly: metodist, issledovatel’, novator? [Higher school teacher: methodologist, researcher, innovator?]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 3, pp. 52–58 (in Russian).
5. Kochukhova E. А. Аkademicheskaya professiya glazami prepodavateley [Academic profession through the eyes of teachers]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies Moscow, 2020, no. 2, pp. 278–303 (in Russian).
6. Margolis А. А., Ponomareva V. V., Sorokova M. G. Osobennosti “rossiyskogo KHirsha”: prediktory tsitiruyemosti nauchnykh statey v RINTS [The “Russian Hirsch”: Predictors of Citation Usage of Scholarly Works in the RSCI]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies Moscow, 2020, no. 1, pp. 230–255 (in Russian).
7. Vek zhivi – vek uchis’: nepreryvnoye obrazovaniye v Rossii [Century live – Century study: lifelong education in Russia]. Edited by I. A. Korshunov, I. D. Frumin. Moscow, VShE Publ., 2019 (in Russian).
8. Nikitina L. A. Vliyaniye issledovatel’skoy kompetentnosti na kachestvo metodicheskoy podgotovki pedagoga [The influence of research competence on the quality of teacher training]. Barnaul, AltGPA Publ., 2009. 205 p. (in Russian).
9. Savenkov A. I. Metodika issledovatel’skogo obucheniya mladshikh shkol’nikov [Research teaching method of junior schoolchildren]. Samara, Uchebnaya literatura: Izdatel’skiy dom “Fedorov” Publ., 2010. 224 p. (in Russian).
10. Hattie John A. S. Vidimoye obucheniye: sintez rezul’tatov boleye 50000 issledovaniy s okhvatom boleye 86 millionov shkol’nikov [Visible learning: synthesizing the results of more than 50,000 studies covering more than 86 million students]. Edited by V. K. Zagvozdkin and E. A. Khamrayeva. Moscow, Natsional’noye obrazovaniye Publ., 2017. 496 p. (in Russian).
( 339.41 kB ) 
( 332.89 kB )
Issue: 1, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: ISSUES OF EDUCATION
Pages: 92 — 96
Downloads: 650