CREATION OF SCIENTIFIC WRITTEN TEXT OF FINAL QUALIFICATION WORK: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2021-5-130-137
According to the standards of higher education, a graduate of a pedagogical university is obliged to conduct a pedagogical study and draw it up in the text of the final qualification work. However, analysis of the works shows that for many future teachers, writing a scientific text causes significant difficulty. The questionnaire revealed typical difficulties and reasons for their occurrence, which are due, on the one hand, to the lack of experience in writing in the process of studying vocational training disciplines. On the other hand, it is not the willingness of students to reflect on the process of speech activity and its products, and also not to own ways of organizing independent work. Typical mistakes in the creation of the text of the graduation work were revealed: the lack of a communicative task, the lack of compliance with the logic and relationship of parts of the text, the inclusion of unprocessed materials from primary sources, the lack of own judgment on the topic being studied. Directions in teaching written scientific speech in the preparation process at the university are indicated: inclusion of tasks in all disciplines of training, programs of pedagogical practices involving writing a text of a scientific style, the use of educational technologies focusing on the use of written text as a result of training. It is concluded that training in the writing of the text of the final qualification work involves the consistent involvement of students in the mastery of the culture of written scientific speech, as well as the experience of the research activity of the teacher.
Keywords: scientific written speech, final qualification work, creation of written text
References:
1. Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart vysshego obrazovaniya – bakalavriat po napravleniyu podgotovki 44.03.05 Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye (s dvumya profilyami podgotovki) № 92 ot 09.02.2016 [Federal state educational standard of higher education – bachelor’s degree in the direction of training 03/44/05 Pedagogical education (with two training profiles) No. 92 dated 2 September 2016]. Portal federal’nykh gosudarstvennykh obrazovatel’nykh standartov vysshego obrazovaniya [Portal of federal state educational standards for higher education] (in Russian). URL: http://fgosvo.ru/news/7/1805 (accessed 3 June 2020).
2. Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart vysshego obrazovaniya – bakalavriat po napravleniyu podgotovki 44.03.05 Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye (s dvumya profilyami podgotovki) № 126 ot 22 February 2018 [Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education – Bachelor’s Degree in the field of training 03.44.05 Pedagogical education (with two training profiles) № 126 of 22.02.2018]. Garant.ru. Informatsionno-pravovoy portal [Garant.ru. Information and legal portal] (in Russian). URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71797864/ (accessed 3 June 2020).
3. Alisov E. A., Vinogradova N. A., Sukhova E. I., Khodakova N. P. Podgotovka i zashchita vypusknoy kvalifikatsionnoy raboty (bakalavrskaya rabota, magisterskaya dissertatsiya): uchebno-metodicheskoye posobiye [Preparation and defense of the final qualifying work (bachelor’s work, master’s thesis): teaching aid]. Moscow, Sputnik + Publ., 2015. 56 p. (in Russian).
4. Bryzgalova S. I. Vvedeniye v nauchno-pedagogicheskoye issledovaniye: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov spetsialiteta, bakalavriata, magistratury [Introduction to scientific and pedagogical research: a textbook for students of specialist program, bachelor’s, master’s degree]. Kaliningrad, IKBFU Publ., 2012. 171 p. (in Russian).
5. Shipilina L. A. Metodologiya psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniy: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov vuzov [Methodology of psychological and pedagogical research: a textbook for university students]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2013. 203 p. (in Russian).
6. Berezhnova E. V., Krayevskiy V. V. Osnovy uchebno-issledovatel’skoy deyatel’nosti studentov [Fundamentals of educational and research activities of students: textbook. for stud. wednesday ped. study. institutions]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2005.128 p. (in Russian).
7. El’konin D. B. Razvitiye ustnoy i pis’mennoy rechi uchashchikhsya [Development of oral and written speech of students]. Moscow, 1998 (in Russian).
8. Tynjälä P. Writing, learning and the development of expertise in higher education. Studies in Writing, 2001, vol. 7, pp. 37–56.
9. Framework for success in Postsecondary writing, 2011. URL: http://wpacouncil.org/files/frameworkfor-success-postsecondary-writing.pdf (accessed 20 May 2020).
10. Kolyabina N. S. Rol’ akademicheskogo pis’ma v formirovanii obshcheprofessional’nykh kompetentsiy magistra [The role of academic writing in the formation of general professional competencies of a master]. Nauchnye vedomosti. Series Humanities, 2016, no. 21 (242), pp. 180–184 (in Russian).
11. Smirnova N. V., Shchemeleva I. Yu. Rol’ pis’ma v sovremennom universitete: analiz zarubezhnoy praktiki obucheniya akademicheskomu pis’mu [The role of writing in a modern university: analysis of foreign practice of teaching academic writing]. Vestnik SPbGU – Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature, 2015, no. 2, pp. 185–197 (in Russian).
12. Makovich G. V. Razvitiye kompetentsiy akademicheskogo pis’ma kak instrument realizatsii gosudarstvennoy programmy po povysheniyu konkurentosposobnosti nauki i obrazovaniya [The development of academic writing competencies as a tool for the implementation of the state program to improve the competitiveness of science and education]. Voprosy upravleniya – Management Issues, 2018, no. 1 (50), pp. 12–18 (in Russian).
13. Korotkina I. B. Akademicheskoye pis’mo: neobkhodimost’ mezhdistsiplinarnykh issledovaniy [Academic writing: the need for interdisciplinary research]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher education in Russia, 2018, no. 10 (27), pp. 64–74 (in Russian).
14. Morozov V. E. Kul’tura pis’mennoy nauchnoy rechi: posobiye dlya studentov filologicheskogo profilya [The culture of written scientific speech: A guide for students of the philological profile]. Moscow, Pushkin State Russian Language Institute Publ., 2007. 268 p. (in Russian).
15. Kotyurova M. P. Kul’tura nauchnoy rechi: tekst i ego redaktirovaniye: uchebnoye posobiye [The culture of scientific speech: text and its editing: textbook]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2008. 280 p. (in Russian).
16. Shestak V. P., Shestak N. V. Formirovaniye nauchno-issledovatel’skoy kompetentnosti i «akademicheskoye pis’mo» [Formation of scientific research competence and “academic writing”]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher education in Russia, 2011, no. 12, pp. 115–119 (in Russian).
17. Nikitina L. A. Analysis of a Lesson as an Educational Resource of Enhancing the Quality of Future Teacher Training Linguistic and Cultural Studies: Traditions and Innovations Proceedings of the XVIIth International Conference on Linguistic and Cultural Studies (LKTI 2017). Tomsk, 2017. Р. 3–9. URL: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-67843-6 (accessed 3 June 2021).
18. Pozdeyeva S. I. K probleme vovlecheniya prepodavateley v nauchno-issledovatel’skuyu deyatel’nost’ [On the problem of involving teachers in research activities]. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoye obozreniye – Pedagogical Review, 2021, vol. 1 (35), pp. 92–95 (in Russian).
( 379.14 kB ) 
( 370.59 kB )
Issue: 5, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: THEORY AND METHODS OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION
Pages: 130 — 137
Downloads: 1093