THE SPECIFICS OF THE FUNCTION OF THE BOUNDARY OF PERSONAL SPACE AND THE LEVEL OF SUBJECTIVE CONTROL IN MARRIED COUPLES
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2021-5-208-221
The article presents the study of the sovereignty of the psychological space of the individual, the function of its boundary and the level of subjective control in married couples with different family experience. The research is based on the modern methods of T. S. Levy, S. K. Nartova-Bochaver, using which we continued to study the phenomenon of personal space, its boundary from the point of view of the subject-environment approach. The study of the psychological boundary of a person’s personal space is a topical topic not only within the individual, but also in the problems of family relations. The family is the primary element of the social space that forms the content characteristics of the personal space of a person who in the future, creating his family, forms such a space for his children. The most important characteristic of psychological space is the integrity of its boundaries. The presence of a holistic psychological space plays an important role in family relationships. The study involved married couples with different experience of family life: less than 7 years and more than 7 years, a total of 110 people. Differences in the «sovereignty of social ties», violations of the boundaries of the physical «I», the territorial integrity of families with different life experience are established. This study continues a series of studies on the specifics of the psychological space of the individual not only in the subjects of the educational sphere of school, university, but also in adult respondents.
Keywords: psychological space of the individual, functions of the border, subjective control, experience of family life
References:
1. Mozgovaya N. N. Issledovaniya fenomena lichnostnogo prostranstva cheloveka v gumanisticheskoy paradigmе [Studies of the phenomenon of a person’s personal space in the humanistic paradigm]. Gumanitarnye i sotsial’noekonomicheskiye nauki – Humane, Social and Economic Sciences, 2006, no. 6 (25), pp. 112–114 (in Russian).
2. Manvelyan N. G. Suverennost’ psikhologicheskogo prostranstva lichnosti i ego granitsy. Kharakteristika i analiz [The doctrine of the psychological sovereignty of the individual]. Saarbryukken, 2014 (in Russian).
3. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. Oprosnik «Suverennost’ psihologicheskogo prostranstva» – novyj metod diagnostiki lichnosti [The questionnaire “The sovereignty of the psychological space” is a new method of personality diagnosis]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 2005, vol. 25, no. 5, p. 77 (in Russian).
4. Kharchev A. G. Sotsiologiya sem’i: problemy stanovleniya nauki [The of research in the field of family psychology]. Moscow, TsSP Publ., 2003. 342 p. (in Russian).
5. Mozgovaya N., Barsukova O. Psychological features of personal space of university students. INTED2019 13th International Technology, Education and Development Conference. Conference proceedings, 2019. Pp. 1617–1622 (accessed 4 June 2021). Doi: 10.21125/inted.2019.0481.
6. Kocharyan A. S., Makarenko A. A., Chzhao S. Osobennosti suverennosti psikhologicheskogo prostranstva u lits s raznym urovnem emotsional’noy zrelosti [Features of the Sovereignty of the psychological space in people with different levels of emotional maturity]. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya – Perspectives of Science and Education, 2016, no. 1, pp. 35–39 (in Russian).
7. Mozgovaya N. N. Lichnostnoye prostranstvo kak predmet nauchnoy refleksii v otechestvennoy i zarubezhnoy psikhologii [Personal space as a subject of scientific reflection in domestic and foreign psychology]. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal’nogo universiteta. Pedagogicheskiye nauki, 2011, vol. 19, p. 31 (in Russian).
8. Levi T. S. Psikhologicheskaya granitsa kak telesnyy fenomen [Psychological boundary as a bodily phenomenon]. Byulleten’ ATOP, 2007, no. 9, pp. 51–68 (in Russian).
9. Shamshikova O. A., Volokhova V. I. Psikhometricheskiy analiz i standartizatsiya zarubezhnoy metodiki «psikhologicheskiye granitsy lichnosti» E. Khartmanna [Psychometric analysis and standardization of the foreign methodology “psychological boundaries of personality” by E. Hartmann]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya – The world of science, culture and education, 2013, no. 5 (42) (in Russian).
10. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. Psikhologiya suverennosti: desyat’ let spustya [The doctrine of the psychological sovereignty of the individual]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2017. 200 p. (in Russian).
11. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. Psikhologicheskoye prostranstvo lichnosti [The psychological space of the individual]. Moscow, Promete Publ., 2005. 312 p. (in Russian).
12. Levi T. S. Metodika diagnostiki psikhologicheskoy granitsy lichnosti [The method of diagnosing the psychological boundary of the personality]. Voprosy psikhologii, 2013, no. 1, pp. 131–146 (in Russian).
13. Rean A. A. Prakticheskaya psikhodiagnostika lichnosti: uchebnoye posobiye [The doctrine of personality research: tutorial]. Saint Petersburg, SPb University Publ., 2001. 224 p. (in Russian).
( 679.18 kB ) 
( 645.64 kB )
Issue: 5, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 208 — 221
Downloads: 1032