FEATURES OF THE MORAL CONSCIOUSNESS OF STUDENTS WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF RESPONSIBILITY IMPLEMENTATION
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2022-1-142-154
The authors substantiated the relevance of the study of the characteristics of moral consciousness and responsibility as a personality trait of modern youth on the example of university students. In the process of studying the responsibility of students as a system of content-semantic and instrumental-style components, 2 groups were identified among them: with “energetic” and “asthenicdifficult” types of realization of this personality trait. Students with the “energetic” type were distinguished by a more stable and conscious desire to manifest and develop it, broad sociocentric motivation, developed internal self-regulation, although with the dominance of personal goals, subjective productivity and insufficient development of skills of responsible behavior, while students with “asthenic difficult” type were more characteristic of frequent avoidance of responsibility, greater external regulation, dominance of asthenic experiences and emotional-personal problems due to self-doubt, low self-esteem, increased anxiety in the process of its manifestation. The features of the moral consciousness of the selected groups of students are analyzed: their value orientations, attitudes in the motivational-need-related sphere, moral consciousness, moral selfdetermination, attitude to the observance of moral norms. Thus, individuals with an “energetic” type of responsibility realization revealed a high value of the values of spiritual satisfaction and preservation of individuality, recognition and respect of other people, help and mercy, education, professional life and hobbies; dominance of the socio-psychological attitude towards freedom; emotional attitude to various strategies of moral behavior, average readiness to comply with moral norms with a high desire for truthfulness; motives for avoiding disapproval of significant others, striving to fulfill duty and obey accepted rules as a basis for moral choice. For the representatives of the “asthenic-difficult” type, the values of spiritual satisfaction and preservation of individuality, self-realization in the spheres of education and professional life were also most important, but in real life they more often realized the values of rest and pleasant pastime. Among their socio-psychological attitudes, the predominant need was to get pleasure from the process of the performed activity, freedom and independence. They recognized moral behavior and the significant influence of moral self-regulation of the individual and environmental factors on it; adopted (or did not accept) various strategies of moral behavior at the emotional and cognitive levels; demonstrated a positive attitude towards the observance of moral norms, an average willingness to implement them in their behavior; a high level of truthfulness and were guided by the motive of good relationships in situations of moral choice. The connections between the peculiarities of moral consciousness and personal responsibility of students are revealed. The description of the individual-typological features of the implementation of responsibility by students, as well as their connections with the peculiarities of moral consciousness, constitutes the scientific novelty of the research results presented in the article.
Keywords: students, responsibility, content-semantic components, instrumental-style characteristics, types of responsibility realization, moral consciousness, terminal values, structure of personal value orientations, socio-psychological attitudes, motivational-need-related sphere, moral self-determination, observance of moral norms, moral consciousness
References:
1. Abul’khanova K. A. Psikhologiya i soznaniye lichnosti (problemy metodologii, teorii i issledovaniya real’noy lichnosti): izbrannyye psikhologicheskiye trudy [Psychology and consciousness of personality (problems of methodology, theory and research of a real personality): selected psychological works]. Moscow, Moscow Psychological and Social Institute Publ., Voronezh, MODEK Publ., 1999. 224 p. (in Russian).
2. Antilogova L. N. Psikhologicheskiye mekhanizmy razvitiya nravstvennogo soznaniya lichnosti. Dis. dokt. psikhol. nauk [Psychological mechanisms of the development of moral consciousness of the individual. Diss. doc. of psychol. sci.]. Novosibirsk, 1999. 434 p. (in Russian).
3. Antonova E. A. Nravstvennoye soznaniye i povedeniye doshkol’nikov s zaderzhkoy psikhicheskogo razvitiya. Avtoref. kand. psikhol. nauk [Moral consciousness and behavior of preschoolers with mental retardation. Abstract of thesis cand. psychol. sci.]. Saint Petersburg, 2012. 21 p. (in Russian).
4. Bezdukhov V. P., Zhirnova T. V. Nravstvenno-tsennostnaya sfera soznaniya studenta: diagnostika i formirovaniye [The moral and value sphere of the student’s consciousness: diagnostics and formation]. Moscow, MPSI Publ., 2008. 202 p. (in Russian).
5. Blumkin V. A. Nravstvennoye vospitaniye (filosofsko-eticheskiye osnovy) [Moral education (philosophical and ethical foundations)]. Voronezh, 1990. 144 p. (in Russian).
6. Bormotova I. M. Moral’noye soznaniye lichnosti [Moral consciousness of personality]. Leningrad, LSU Publ., 1984. 161 p. (in Russian).
7. Bratus’ B. S. Nravstvennoye soznaniye lichnosti (psikhologicheskoye issledovaniye) (Novoye v zhizni, nauke, tekhnike. Ser. «Etika», no. 3) [Moral consciousness of personality (Psychological research). (New in life, science, technology. Ser. “Ethics”, no. 3)]. Moscow, Znaniye Publ., 1985. 64 p. (in Russian).
8. Drobnitskiy O. G. Struktura moral’nogo soznaniya [The structure of moral consciousness]. Problemy nravstvennosti [Problems of morality]. Ed. T. A. Kuzmina. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977. Pp. 39–70 (in Russian).
9. Znakov V. V. Psikhologiya subyekta i psikhologiya chelovecheskogo bytiya [Psychology of the subject and the psychology of human existence]. Sub”yekt, lichnost’ i psikhologiya chelovecheskogo bytiya [Subject, personality and psychology of human existence]. Ed. V. V. Znakov and Z. I. Ryabikina. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2005. Pp. 9–44 (in Russian).
10. Ivanov I. A. Nravstvennoye soznaniye i povedeniye cheloveka. Aktual’nyye kontseptsii razvitiya gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk [Moral consciousness and human behavior. Actual concepts of the development of the humanities and natural sciences]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Materials of international scientific-practical conferences]. Tikhoretsk, 2016. Pp. 65–67 (in Russian).
11. Kupreychenko A. B., Vorob’yeva A. E. Nravstvennoye samoopredeleniye molodezhi [Moral self-determination of youth]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2013. 480 p. (in Russian).
12. Manerko I. V. Dukhovno-nravstvennyye kachestva lichnosty voennosluzhashchego sovremennoy Rossiyskoy armii. Dis. kand. filos. nauk [Spiritual and moral qualities of the personality of a military man in the modern Russian army. Diss. cand. of philos. sci.]. Moscow, 2011. 179 p. (in Russian).
13. Pozdnyakova O. K. Formirovaniye nravstvennogo soznaniya budushchego uchitelya v protsesse obucheniya v pedagogicheskom universitete. Dis. kand. ped. nauk [Formation of the moral consciousness of the future teacher in the process of teaching at the pedagogical university. Diss. cand. of ped. sci.]. Samara, 2006. 492 p. (in Russian).
14. Ruvinsky L. V. Nravstvennoye vospitaniye lichnosti [Moral education of the personality]. Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 1981. 184 p. (in Russian).
15. Spirkin A. G. Soznaniye i samosoznaniye [Consciousness and selfconsciousness]. Moscow, 1972. 304 p. (in Russian).
16. Stepanova S. E. Nravstvennoye soznaniye i povedeniye molodezhi v sovremennykh usloviyakh. Dis. kand. filos. nauk [Moral consciousness and behavior of youth in modern conditions. Diss. cand. of philos. sci.]. Cheboksary, 2004. 157 p. (in Russian).
17. Titarenko A. I. Sushchnost’, struktura i funktsii morali [The essence, structure and functions of morality]. Marksistskaya etika [Marxist ethics]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1980. Pp. 96–133 (in Russian).
18. Fabulova M. A. Psikhologicheskiye usloviya formirovaniya nravstnennogo soznaniya studentov-medikov sredstvami inostrannogo yazyka. Dis. kand. psikhol. nauk [Psychological conditions for the formation of moral consciousness of medical students by means of a foreign language. Diss. cand. of psychol. sci.]. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2013. 193 p. (in Russian).
19. Fomina N. A., Aipova M. M. Zarubezhnyye psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya [Foreign psychological studies of the development of the moral consciousness of the individual]. Psikhologiya XXI v.: vyzovy, poiski, vektory razvitiya. Sbornik materialov Vserossiyskogo simpoziuma psikhologov (Ryazan’, 9–10 aprelya, 2021 g.) s mezhduarodnym uchastiyem [Psychology of the XXI century: challenges, searches, vectors of development. Collection of materials of the All-Russian Symposium of Psychologists (Ryazan, April 9–10, 2021) with international participation]. Ed. D. V. Sochivko. Ryazan, Academy of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Publ., 2021. Pp. 2404–2415 (in Russian).
20. Yadov V. A. Sotsial’naya identifikatsiya v krizisnom obshchestve [Social identification in a crisis society]. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal – Sociological Journal, 1994, no 1, pp. 35–52 (in Russian).
21. Il’yicheva I. M. Psikhologiya dukhovnosti. Dis. dokt. psikhol. nauk [Psychology of spirituality. Diss. doc. psychol. sci.]. Saint Petersburg, 2003. 450 p. (in Russian).
22. Kohlberg L. Moral stages and moralization: The Cognitive Development Approach. Moral development and behavior. Theory research and Social issues. N.Y., 1976. Pp. 31–53.
23. Rotter J. B. Social Learning and Clinical Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, New York, 1954. 466 p.
24. Rotter J. B., and Mulry R. C. Internal versus external control of reinforcement and decision time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, no. 2, pp. 598–604.
25. Krupnov A. I., Novikova I. A., Shlyakhta L. F. Kompleksnyye issledovaniya svoystv lichnosti: teoriya i praktika: uchebnoye posobiye [Complex studies of personality traits: theory and practice: textbook]. Moscow, RUDN Publ., 2017. Pp. 9–30 (in Russian).
26. Fomina N. A., Tenyayeva O. V. Osobennosti otvetstvennosti kak sistemnogo svoystva lichnosti podrostkov s deviantnym povedeniyem [Features of responsibility as a systemic property of the personality of adolescents with deviant behavior]. Rossiyskiy nauchnyy zhurnal – Russian Scientific Journal, 2010, no. 2 (15), pp. 212–218 (in Russian).
27. Fomina N. A., Orlov V. B. Sootnosheniye osobennostey otvetstvennosti i ustanovok na upotrebleniye alkogolya u podrostkov [Correlation of the characteristics of responsibility and attitudes towards alcohol consumption in adolescents]. Chelovecheskiy kapital – Human Capital, 2017, no. 7 (103), pp. 22–25 (in Russian).
28. Fomina N. A., Bespalova T. M. Sistemnoye issledovaniye otvetstvennosti kak svoystva lichnosti starsheklassnikov i kursantov voyennogo vuza i eye proyavleniy v rechevoy deyatel’nosti [A systemic study of responsibility as a personality trait of high school students and cadets of a military university and its manifestations in speech activity]. Sbornik nauchykh trudov, posvyashchennykh 70-letiyu A. I. Krupnova [Collection of scientific papers dedicated to the 70th anniversary of A. I. Krupnov]. Moscow, RUDN Publ., 2009, pp. 354–361 (in Russian).
29. Fomina N. A., Zueva M. N. Osobennosti i psikhologicheskaya struktura otvetstvennosti studentov – budushchikh meditsinskikh rabotnikov [Features and psychological structure of the responsibility of future medical students]. Vestnik RUDN. Ser. «Psikhologiya i pedagogika» – RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 2012, no. 3, pp. 102–107 (in Russian).
30. Fomina N. A., Kubareva Ya. N. Rezul’taty sistemnogo issledovaniya otvetstvennosti studentov yuridicheskikh fakul’tetov [Results of a systematic study of the responsibility of students of law faculties]. Lichnost’ v prirode i obshchestve: nauchnyye trudy molodykh uchenykh. Ser. «Psikhologiya i pedagogika». Vyp. 17 (po materialam XVII mezhvuzovskikh psikhologicheskikh chteniy (24 aprelya 2014 g.) [“Personality in nature and society”: Scientific works of young scientists. Series “Psychology and Pedagogy”. Issue 17. (based on the materials of the XVII Interuniversity Psychological Readings (April 24, 2014)]. Comp. and scientific ed. A. V. Ivashchenko, N. B. Karabushchenko, E. N. Polyanskaya. Moscow, RUDN Publ., 2014, pp. 23–25 (in Russian).
31. Fomina N. A., Aleykin A. G. Osobennosti i psikhologicheskaya struktura obshchitel’nosti, organizovannosti i otvetstvennosti studentov – budushchikh upravlentsev [Features and psychological structure of sociability, organization and responsibility of students – future managers]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiy poisk – Psychological and Pedagogical Search, 2011, no. 3 (22), pp. 99–105 (in Russian).
32. Fomina N. A., Pastukhova M. V. Otvetstvennost’ kak sistemnoye svoystvo muzhchiny v sootnoshenii s fenomenom ottsovstva [Responsibility as a systemic property of a man’s personality in relation to the phenomenon of paternity]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiy poisk – Psychological and Pedagogical Search, 2013, no. 4, pp. 54–63 (in Russian).
( 471.07 kB ) 
( 459.5 kB )
Issue: 1, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 142 — 154
Downloads: 593