PSYCHOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF PERSONAL READINESS FOR STUDENTS’ ACTIVITIES IN A SITUATION OF CHANGE

Buravleva Natalya Anatolyevna, Karakulova Olga Viktorovna, Atamanova Inna Viktorovna, Bogomaz Sergey Aleksandrovich

DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2022-2-146-155

Information About Author:

Buravleva N. A., Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kiyevskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). Karakulova O. V., Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kiyevskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). Atamanova I. V., Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Genetics and Clinical Psychology, National Research Tomsk State University (pr. Lenina, 36, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634050). Bogomaz S. А., Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Organizational Psychology, National Research Tomsk State University (pr. Lenina, 36, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634050).

The current situation is characterized by changes in various spheres of human life, leading to a significant restructuring of his activities, condition. People react differently to changes. They plunge some into a state of stress, confusion about the future, while others are mobilized, put in front of the need for change. The different position and behavior of a person in a situation of change are largely determined by the resources that a person possesses. In this situation, the problem of studying the self-regulation of the individual, his active life position in the changing conditions of study, work and everyday life becomes relevant. The subject of discussion is increasingly the question of what can serve as psychological resources for a person in a situation of transitivity. This question is especially relevant in relation to students, their personal readiness for activity. Students of Tomsk universities took part in the presented study (N=263). It used regression and cluster analysis. The results of the study showed that emotional intelligence, motivation, values of preservation, values of openness, goal-setting and reflection should be considered as psychological resources of personal readiness for students’ activities. The results of the study have theoretical and practical significance. They actualize the issue of taking into account the competencies of future specialists who will have to work in new conditions. The results of the study indicate that the professional training of specialists should include not only the acquisition of fundamental knowledge and professional skills, but also the development of personality in the educational process.

Keywords: personal readiness for activity, psychological resources, students, motivation, value orientations, emotional intelligence, goal setting, reflection

References:

1. Abul’hanova-Slavskaya K. A. Vremya lichnosti i vremya zhizni [Personality time and life time]. Saint Petersburg, Aleteya Publ., 2001. 299 p. (in Russian).

2. Lazarus R. S. Coping theory and research: Past, present and future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1993, V. 55. P. 237–247.

3. Muzdybayev K. Strategiya sovladaniya s zhiznennymi trudnostyami. Teoreticheskiy analiz [Coping strategy with life’s difficulties. Theoretical analysis]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii – Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 1998, no. 2, pp. 102–112 (in Russian).

4. Markov V. N. Resursy razvitiya psikhicheskoy struktury [Resources for the development of mental structure]. Mir psikhologii – World of psychology, 2016, no. 1, pp. 92–105 (in Russian).

5. Antsyferova L. I. Lichnost’ v trudnykh zhiznennykh usloviyakh: pereosmyslivaniye, preobrazovaniye situatsiy i psikhologicheskaya zashchita [Personality in difficult life conditions: rethinking, transformation of situations and psychological protection]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 1994, no. 1 (15), pp. 3–18 (in Russian).

6. Buravleva N. A., Bogomaz S. A. Gotovnost’ studentov tekhnicheskikh vuzov k innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti [Readiness for Innovative Activities Among Students of Technical Universities]. Rossiyskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Russian Psychological Journal, 2020, no. 17 (3), pp. 30–43 (in Russian).

7. Perikova E. I., Bogomaz S. A., Atamanova I. V. Spetsifika psikhologicheskoy gotovnosti k innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti molodezhi Sankt-Peterburga i Tomska [Specifics of psychological readiness for innovative activity of the youth of St. Petersburg and Tomsk]. Science for Education, 2020, no. 1(10), pp. 62–78 (in Russian).

8. Antsyferova L. I. Razvitiye lichnosti i problemy gerontopsihologii [Personality development and problems of gerontopsychology]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2006. 512 p. (in Russian).

9. Rubinshteyn S. L. Osnovy obshchey psikhologii [Fundamentals of general psychology]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2010. 713 p. (in Russian).

10. Anan’ev B. G. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya [Man as an object of knowledge]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2010. 288 p. (in Russian).

11. Lyusin D. V. Novaya metodika dlya izmereniya emotsional’nogo intellekta: oprosnik EmIn [A new technique for measuring emotional intelligence: the EmIn questionnaire]. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika, 2006, no. 4, pp. 3–22 (in Russian).

12. Schwartz S. H. An Оverview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2012, no. 2 (1), pp. 1–20.

13. Karandashev V. N. Metodika Shvarca dlya izucheniya cennostej lichnosti: koncepciya i metodicheskoe rukovodstvo [Schwartz methodology for the study of personality values: concept and methodological guidance]. St. Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2004. 70 p. (in Russian).

14. Sugonyayev K. V. Issledovaniye psikhometricheskikh kharakteristik «Oprosnika tsennostnykh portretov» Sh. Shvartsa v adaptatsii V. Karandasheva i ego dorabotka [The psychometric characteristics of S. Schwartz’s “Questionnaire of Value Portraits” adapted by V. Karandashev and its revision]. In: Tarazevich S.E. (ed.) Aktual’nye problemy ergonomiki, obitayemosti i psikhologicheskogo soprovozhdeniya personala ob”ektov spetsial’nogo naznacheniya: materialy II mezhotraslevoy nauchno-prаkticheskoy konferentsii, 8 dekabrya 2016 goda, g. Odintsovo Moskovskoy oblasti [Topical problems of ergonomics, habitability and psychological support of special purpose personnel: materials of the II interdisciplinary scientific and practical conference, December 8, 2016, Odintsovo, Moscow region]. Korolev, PSTM Publ., 2018. Pp. 186–198 (in Russian).

15. Mandrikova E. Yu. Razrabotka Oprosnika samoorganizatsii deyatel’nosti (OSD) [Development of a Questionnaire for self-organization of activities (OSD)]. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika – Psychological diagnostics, 2010, no. 2, pp. 87–111 (in Russian).

16. Leont’ev D. A., Osin E. N. Refleksiya «khoroshaya» i «durnaya»: ot ob”yasnitel’noy modeli k differentsial’noy diagnostike [Reflection “good” and “bad”: from an explanatory model to differential diagnosis]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki – Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2014, no. 4 (11), pp. 110–135 (in Russian).

17. Osin E. N., Leont’ev D. A. Kratkiye russkoyazychnye shkaly diagnostiki sub”ektivnogo blagopoluchiya: psikhometricheskiye kharakteristiki i sravnitel’nyy analiz [Brief Russian-language diagnostic scales of subjective wellbeing: psychometric characteristics and comparative analysis]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nye peremeny – Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2020, no. 1 (155), pp. 117–142 (in Russian).

18. Gordeyeva T. O., Sychev O. A., Osin E. N. Oprosnik «Shkaly akademicheskoy motivatsii» [Questionnaire «Scales of academic motivation»]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2014, no. 4 (35), pp. 96–107 (in Russian).

19. Lebedeva N. M., Tatarko A. N. Metodika issledovaniya otnosheniya lichnosti k innovatsiyam [Methods of researching the individual’s attitude to innovation]. Al’manakh sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya – Almanac of Modern Science and Education, 2009, no. 4-2 (23), pp. 89–96.

20. Bar-On R. The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence. Psico-thema, 2006, vol. 18, pp. 13–25. URL: http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/3271.pdf (accessed 27 December 2021).

21. Caruso D. R., Mayer J. D., Salovey P. Relation of an ability measure of emotional intelligence to personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2002, vol. 79, pp. 306–320.

22. Lyusin D. V. Sposobnost’ k ponimaniyu emotsiy: Psikhometricheskiy i kognitivnyy aspekty [Ability to understand emotions: Psychometric and cognitive aspects]. Sotsial’noye poznaniye v epokhu bystrykh politicheskikh i ekonomicheskikh peremen [Social cognition in an era of rapid political and economic change]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2000. Pp. 25–35 (in Russian).

23. Sternberg R. D., Forsayt D. B., Hedland D. Prakticheskiy intellekt [Practical intelligence]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2002. 265 p. (in Russian).

24. Grishina N. V. «Samoizmeneniya» lichnosti: vozmozhnoye i neobkhodimoye [“Self-change” of personality: possible and necessary]. Vestnik SPbGU. Psikhologiya i pedagogika – Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Psychology and pedagogy, 2018, no. 2 (8), pp. 126–138 (in Russian).

( 565.13 kB ) ( 553.17 kB )

Issue: 2, 2022

Series of issue: Issue 2

Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY

Pages: 146 — 155

Downloads: 592