BARRIERS IN THE PEDAGOGICAL SUPPORT OF ELECTRONIC LEARNING IN A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2022-3-68-78
E-learning is becoming an integral part of the educational process in universities. Online interaction between students, students and teachers remains significant in e-learning. It affects the involvement of students in the educational process. The article deals with the analysis of the interaction difficulties in e-learning which teachers and students face in universities. The author looks for the difficulties in the results of sociological research conducted at Tomsk State University and Tomsk Polytechnic University in 2016, and the results of the focus group «Online course support» organized at Tomsk State University in 2018. The article highlights social, organizational, technical and economic difficulties for the educational process subjects in the pedagogical support of e-learning. Also, recommendations were formulated to overcome these difficulties. The main difficulties for teachers and students in quantitative research are the lack of time, the lack of ICT competencies necessary to work in an electronic campus environment. In addition, students note failures in the work of the portal. The focus group participants agree on the weak communication of teachers with students and fellow students among themselves, as well as technical difficulties when working with platforms and their technical services. Quantitative studies showed more technical and organizational difficulties, and qualitative research showed social and technical difficulties. The results will be useful for specialists and teachers involved in the organization of e-learning in universities to create an effective system of pedagogical support.
Keywords: e-learning, higher education, support of e-learning, difficulties in support of e-learning
References:
1. Uroki «stress-testa»: vuzy v usloviyakh pandemii i posle neye [Lessons from the «stress test» universities in the context of a pandemic and after it] (in Russian). URL: http://fgosvo.ru/uploadfiles/lesson_stress_test.pdf (accessed 07 July 2021).
2. Bhuasiri W., Xaymoungkhoun O., Zo H., Jeung Rho J., Ciganek A. P. Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58 (2) (2012), pp. 843-855URL: https://www-sciencedirect-com.ez.lib.tsu.ru/science/article/pii/S0360131511002545?via%3Dihub#bib83 (accessed 07 July 2021).
3. Krasnova G. A., Mozhaeva G. V. Elektronnoye obrazovaniye v epokhu tsifrovoy transformatsii [E-education in the era of digital transformation]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 2019. 200 p. (in Russian). URL: https://ido.tsu.ru/science/pub/2019/Krasnova_Mozhaeva_Monografija.pdf (accessed 07 July 2021).
4. Mozhayeva G. V. Elektronnoye obucheniye v vuze: sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya [E-learning at a university: modern development trends]. Gumanitarnaya informatika – Humanitarian Informatics, 2013, no. 7, pp. 126–138 (in Russian).
5. Krasnoslobodtsev A. V. Pedagogicheskoye soprovozhdeniye distantsionnogo obucheniya spetsialistov-ekologov v sisteme povysheniya kvalifikatsii. Avtoref. dis. kand. ped. nauk [Pedagogical support of distance learning for environmental specialists in the system of advanced training. Abstract of thesis cand. of ped. sci.]. Elets, 2017. 21 p. (in Russian). URL: https://dlib.rsl.ru/viewer/01008711430#?page=6 (accessed 07 July 2021).
6. Veledinskaya S. B. Effektivnoye soprovozhdeniye elektronnogo obucheniya: tekhnologii vovlecheniya i uderzhaniya uchashchihsya [Effective E-learning support: learning engagement and retention technologies]. Obrazovatel’nye tekhnologii – Educational technologies, 2015, no 3, pp. 104–115 (in Russian). URL: https://www.iedtech.ru/journal/2015/3/effective-support-e-learning/ (accessed 7 July 2021).
7. Moshkina E. V. Organizatsionno-pedagogicheskoye soprovozhdeniye protsessa podgotovki studentov zaochnoy formy v usloviyakh elektronnogo obucheniya. Avtoref. dis. kand. ped. nauk [Organizational and pedagogical support of the process of training correspondence students in the context of e-learning. Abstract of thesis cand. of ped. sci.]. Krasnoyarsk, 2014. 22 p. (in Russian). URL: http://www.kspu.ru/upload/documents/2014/10/15/2445fe407a0c404f72cd8737a224136a/avtoreferat-ev-moshkinoj.pdf (accessed 07 July 2021).
8. Prikaz Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii ot 24.01.2020 № 41 «Ob utverzhdenii metodik rascheta pokazateley federal’nogo proekta «Kadry dlya tsifrovoy ekonomiki» Natsional’noy programmy «Tsifrovaya ekonomika Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Order of the Ministry of Economic Development in Russia dated January 24, 2020 no. 41 On approval of methods for calculating indicators of the federal project «Personnel for the Digital Economy» of the National Program «Digital Economy of the Russian Federation»] (in Russian). URL: https://economy.gov.ru/material/file/bd31fe31b5135c35e402b702c346f304/41_24012020.pdf (accessed 07 July 2021).
9. Polozheniye ob elektronnom obuchenii, distantsionnykh tekhnologiyah v NI TGU [Regulationson e-learning, distance technologies at NI TSU] (in Russian). URL: https://ido.tsu.ru/normdocs/elearning/doc/462_OD_Polozhenie_ob_jelektronnom_obuchenii_IDO.pdf (accessed 07 July 2021).
10. Prepodavateli i studenty TGU ob elektronnom obuchenii. 2015–2016 god [TSU teachers and students about e-learning 2015-2016] (in Russian). URL: https://ido.tsu.ru/science/projects/proj2016/elearning15-16.pdf (accessed 07 July 2021).
11. Mneniye prepodavateley TPU ob ispol’zovanii elektronnykh kursov v uchebnom protsesse. 2016 god [Opinion of TPU teachers on the use of electronic courses in the educational process 2016] (in Russian). URL: https://portal.tpu.ru/eL/training/monitoring_eo/Tab1/prepodavately_16.pdf (accessed 07 July 2021).
12. Mneniye studentov TPU ob ispol’zovanii elektronnykh kursov v uchebnom protsesse. 2016 god [Opinion of TPU students on the use of electronic courses in the educational process 2016] (in Russian). URL: https://portal.tpu.ru/eL/training/monitoring_eo/Tab1/studenty_16.pdf (accessed 07 July 2021).
13. Rossiyskoye vyssheye obrazovaniye: uroki pandemii i mery po razvitiyu sistemy [Russian Higher Education: the Pandemic Lessons and Measures to Develop Systems]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 2020. 200 p. (in Russian). URL: http://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/manager/Repository/koha:000566947?sort=ss_dateNormalized%255C (accessed 07 July 2021).
14. Gruzdev I. A., Kamal’dinova L. R., Kalinin R. G. Rezul’taty oprosa studentov rossiyskikh vuzov, osushchestvlyayushchikh perekhod na distantsionnyy format obucheniya [Results of a survey of Russian universities students making the transition to a distance learning format]. Sovremennaya analitika obrazovaniya, 2020, no. 6 (36), pp. 62–67 (in Russian). URL: https://ioe.hse.ru/data/2020/05/26/1551527214/%D0%A1%D0%90%D0%9E%206(36)_%D1%8D%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9.pdf (accessed 07 July 2021).
15. Zhuklina V. N. Sovershenstvovaniye pedagogicheskogo masterstva prepodavateley tekhnicheskogo vuza s ispol’zovaniyem uchebnogo dialoga. Avtoref. dis. kand. ped. nauk [Improving the pedagogical skills of a technical university teachers using an educational dialog. Abstract of thesis cand. of ped. sci.]. Penza, 2007. Pp. 7–21 (in Russian).
16. Kovtun E. N., Rodionova S. E. Nagruzka prepodavateley i studentov v novykh usloviyakh obucheniya: printsipy planirovaniya i ucheta [The load of teachers and students in the new learning environment: principles of planning and accounting]. Filologiya i kul’tura – Philology and Culture, 2012, no. 2 (28), pp. 59–63 (in Russian).
17. Tipovoye polozheniye ob obrazovatel’nom uchrezhdenii vysshego professional’nogo obrazovaniya (vysshem uchebnom zavedenii): utverzhdeno postanovleniyem Pravitel’stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 14 fevralya 2008 g. no. 71 [Model regulation on an educational institution of higher professional education (higher educational institution): approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 14 Feb. 2008 No. 71] (in Russian). URL: https://base.garant.ru/192772/ (accessed 15 July 2021).
18. Zakharova U. S., Tanasenko K. I. MOOK v vysshem obrazovanii: dostoinstva i nedostatki dlya prepodavateley [MOOCs in Higher Education: Advantages and Pitfalls for Instructors]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies Moscow, 2019, no. 3, pp. 176–202 (in Russian).
19. Roshchin S. Y., Rudakov V. N. Sovmeshcheniye ucheby i raboty studentami rossiyskikh vuzov [Combining study and work by students of Russian universities]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies, 2014, no. 2, pp. 152–179 (in Russian).
20. Monitoring nauchnykh kadrov vysshey kvalifikatsii ISIEZ NIU VSHE za 2019 g. [Monitoring of highly qualified scientific personnel by ISSEK NRU HSE for 2019]. Ofitsial’nyy statisticheskiy sbornik «Indikatory obrazovaniya» – Official Statistical Compilation “Education Indicators: 2020”, 2020 (in Russian). URL: https://issek.hse.ru/news/350448456.html (accessed 07 July 2021).
21. Bazaliy R. V. Razvitiye motivatsii studentov v usloviyakh distantsionnogo obucheniya [Development of student motivation in the context of distance learning]. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psikhologiya – World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology, 2020, no. 3 (in Russian). URL: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/03PDMN320.pdf (accessed 15 July 2021).
22. Ershteyn L. B. Chrezmernaya nagruzka prepodavateley vuzov kak faktor razrusheniya vysshego obrazovaniya v Rossii [Excessive workload of university teachers as a factor in the destruction of hugher education in Russia]. Vestnik Permskogo natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye nauki – PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin, 2021, no. 2, pp. 75–87 (in Russian).
23. Yekefallah L., Namdar P., Panahi R., Dehghankar L. Factors related to students` satisfaction with holding e-learning during the Covid-19 pandemic based on the dimensions of e-learning. HELIYON. 2021. № 7 (7). URL: https://www-webofscience-com.ez.lib.tsu.ru/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000700484300021 (accessed 07 July 2021).
Issue: 3, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: HIGHER EDUCATION
Pages: 68 — 78
Downloads: 520