EXPERIENCE OF A VITAL THREAT IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND ITS CORRELATION WITH THE PERSONALITY TRAITS OF STUDENTS
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2022-5-169-179
In the context of the ongoing threat of coronavirus, it is important to study personality models that largely determine the ability to predict health-oriented behavior, as well as the risk of anxiety, anxiety, and experiencing danger. In the article, the experience of a vital threat is analyzed as an experience of danger in relation to the mental Self, body, world, surrounding people, significant as an individual value. The study is aimed at studying the experience of the vital threat under the COVID-19 pandemic and its relationship with the personal traits of students. The empirical study was used by the Experience Scale of “Danger-Safety”, R. B. Kettell’s 16-factor personality questionnaire (16 PF), the sample was students of the medical college of the Udmurt Republic (119 people). Mathematical methods processing methods were used: description statistics, correlation analysis, the SPSS 11.5 For Windows program. It was revealed that the experiences of the threat in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to the Self and non-Self are differentiated, namely: students have a more pronounced experience of insecurity in relation to the world and the people around them. The components of the experience of threat on the Scale of “Danger-security” are structurally related to the communicative, regulatory, emotional and intellectual properties of a personality. The greatest number of connections between the experience of danger-safety relief links is established with the communicative properties of the individual. The students revealed a high involvement of personality traits in the experience of danger-security in relation to the mental Self and in relation to the body. The results obtained can be applied by medical college administration, teachers, academic mentors of student groups. They can be used by practitioner-psychologists providing counselling for students of medical colleges to prevent students from negative experiences and stress in the COVID-19 pandemic and in psychological education and counseling.
Keywords: threat, danger-security, personality traits, experience, pandemic
References:
1. Kharlamenkova N. E., Tarabrina N. V., Bykhovets Yu. V., Vorona O. A., Kazymova N. N., Dymova E. N., Shatalova N. E. Psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost’ lichnosti: implitsitnaya i eksplitsitnaya kontseptsii [Psychological safety of the individual: implicit and explicit concepts]. Moscow, Institute of psychology RAS Publ., 2017. 263 р. (in Russian).
2. Maslou A. Motivatsiya i lichnost’ [Motivation and personality]. Saint Petersburg, Evraziya Publ., 2001. 479 р. (in Russian).
3. Sidorov P. I. Ot mental’noy ekologii k mental’noy meditsine [From mental ecology to mental medicine]. Ekologiya cheloveka – Human Ecology, 2013, no. 1, рр. 33–38 (in Russian).
4. Antsyferova L. I. Razvitiye lichnosti i problemy gerontopsikhologii [Personality development and gerontopsychology problems]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2004. 415 р. (in Russian).
5. Veshchikova M. I., Zvereva N. V. Izmeneniya vospriyatiya opasnosti na raznykh etapakh vvedeniya karantina v svyazi s epidemiyey COVID-19 na zhenskoy vyborke [Changes in danger perception at different levels of lockdown during COVID-19 pandemic in women]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya – The Moscow University Herald. Series 14. Psychology, 2021, no. 3, рр. 23–38 (in Russian). DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2021.03.02
6. Kuznetsova A. S., Gushchin M. V., Titova M. A. Trudovoy stress i proaktivnyye koping-strategii srednego meditsinskogo personala na nachal’nom etape pandemii COVID-19 [Work stress and proactive coping strategies in hospital nurses during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya – The Moscow University Herald. Series 14. Psychology, 2021, no. 2, рр. 199–236 (in Russian).
7. Litvinova A. V., Koteneva A. V., Kokurin A. V., Ivanov V. S. Problemy psikhologicheskoy bezopasnosti v ekstremal’nykh usloviyakh zhiznedeyatel’nosti [Problems of psychological safety of a person in extreme conditions of life]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya – Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2021, 10 (1), рр. 8–16 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2021100101
8. Rasskazova E. I., Emelin V. A., Tkhostov A. Sh. Kategorichnyye predstavleniya o prichinakh, proyavleniyakh i posledstviyakh koronavirusa: psikhologicheskoye soderzhaniye i svyaz’ s povedeniyem [Radical beliefs about the causes, manifestations and consequences of coronavirus: the psychological content and their relationship with behaviour]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya – The Moscow University Herald. Series 14. Psychology, 2020, no. 2, рр. 62–82 (in Russian). DOI: 10.11621/rpo.2021.05
9. Kopteva N. V. Ontologicheskaya uverennost’: konstrukt, diagnosticheskiye metodiki, perspektivy issledovaniya [Ontological security: concept, diagnostic techniques, research perspectives]. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki – Izvestiya TulGU. Humanitarian Sciences, 2014, no. 4 (1), рр. 193–202 (in Russian).
10. Laing R. D. Raskolotoye “Ya” [The Divided Self]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., Saint-Petersburg, Belyy krolik Pabl., 1995. 218 p. (in Russian).
11. Volochkov A. A., Kopteva N. V., Popov A. Yu. et al. Aktivnost’, tsennostnaya napravlennost’ i psikhologicheskoye zdorov’ye studenchestva [Activity, value orientation and students’ psychological health]. Perm, Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University Publ., 2015. 200 р. (in Russian).
12. Kopteva N. V. Osobennosti ontologicheskoy uverennosti i otchuzhdeniya, sootvetstvuyushchiye nevrozu i norme [Features of ontological security and alienation corresponding to neurosis and norm]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya 1: Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul’tury – Izvestiya Ural Federal University Journal. Series 1. Issues in Education, Science and Culture, 2017, vol. 23, no. 2, рр. 69–80 (in Russian).
13. Karpova E. B., Nikolayeva E. A. Negativnyye psikhoemotsional’nyye posledstviya pandemii COVID-19 v gruppe riska [Negative psycho-emotional consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in risk groups]. Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – National Psychological Journal, 2020, 3 (39), рр. 66–74. DOI: 10.11621/npj.2020.0308 (In Russian).
14. Kozlova L. V., Kostrigin A. A. Stress, vyzvannyy ugrozoy zarazheniya koronavirusom, i preobladayushchiye koping-strategii u molodezhi [Stress caused by the threat of coronavirus infection and dominant coping strategies in youth]. Vestnik po pedagogike i psikhologii Yuzhnoy Sibiri – The Bulletin on Pedagogics and Psychology of Southern Siberia, 2020, no. 4, рр. 33–48 (in Russian).
15. Kuvayeva I. O., Strel’nikova A. M. Osobennosti sovladaniya so spetsificheskoy trudnoy situatsiyey: pandemiya COVID-19 [The features of coping with a specific challenging situation (covid-19 pandemic)]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya 1: Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul’tury – Izvestiya Ural Federal University Journal. Series 1. Issues in Education, Science and Culture, 2021, vol. 27, no. 2, рр. 84–91 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15826/izv1.2021.27.2.032
16. Tarabrina N. V. Psikhologiya posttravmaticheskogo stressa: teoriya i praktika [Psychology of post-traumatic stress: theory and practice]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2009. 304 р. (in Russian).
17. Tuzova O. N., Stepanova D. N. Sub’’yektivnaya otsenka rossiyanami lichnoy psikhologicheskoy i pravovoy bezopasnosti v usloviyakh pandemii [Psychological and Legal Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic]. Psikhologiya i pravo – Psychology and Law, 2021, 11 (1), рр. 210–222 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2021110116
18. Тkhostov A. Sh., Rasskazova E. I. Psikhologicheskoye soderzhaniye trevogi i profilaktiki v situatsii infodemii: zashchita ot koronavirusa ili “porochnyy krug” trevogi? [Psychological contents of anxiety and the prevention in an infodemic situation: protection against coronavirus or the “vicious circle” of anxiety?]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya – Councelling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2020, vol. 28, no. 2 (108), рр. 70–89 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2020280204
19. Bao Y., Sun Y., Meng S., Shi J., Lu L. 2019-n CoV epidemic: address mental health care to empower society. Lancet, 2020, Feb. 22, 395 (10224), e37–e38. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30309-3
20. Cheng S. K., Wong C. W., Tsang L., Wong K. C. Psychological distress and negative appraisals in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Psychological Medicine, 2004, no. 34 (7), рр. 1187–1195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291704002272
21. Frost R., Steketee G. Cognitive approaches to obsessions and compulsions: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Oxford, Elsevier, 2002. 516 р.
22. Moritz S., Pohl R. Biased Processing of Threat-Related Information Rather Than Knowledge Deficits Contributes to Overestimation of Threat in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Behavior Modification, 2009, 33(6), рр. 763–777. DOI: 10.1177/0145445509344217
23. Kapustina A. N. Mnogofaktornaya lichnostnaya metodika R. Kettella [R. Кattell’s multifactorial personality technique]. Saint-Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2001. 112 р. (In Russian).
( 462.54 kB ) 
( 451.27 kB )
Issue: 5, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 169 — 179
Downloads: 554