Interactive simulator as a means of formative assessment
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2023-4-141-152
The article shows that in the current situation of the development of the education system, new assessment methods are needed that favor the implementation of the principles of dynamics, development and accumulation of experience, expansion of educational results by students. Formative assessment turns out to be a very effective technology, as it is one of the options that is applicable when teaching at different levels of education, specialists of different profiles; promotes the development of personality and activity of participants in educational relations, as it is built on the principle of feedback. It is noted that the principle of dialogism maximally meets the tasks that teachers and teachers of higher education have to solve in the conditions of the new Federal State Educational Standards. The results of the use of interactive simulators for the formation and assessment of the level of development of universal pedagogical competencies developed by the author’s team are shown, which allow us to say that there are no differences by region, do not depend on the contingent of students and the qualifications of teachers, which is an indicator of their stability and reliability. Significant differences in courses, which allowed us to deduce a pattern in increasing the decision time and, accordingly, higher scores from the 1st course to the 4th, allows us to talk about the possibility of the simulator to track the development of the competence of future teachers, the formation of their responsibility and a more serious attitude to pedagogical situations. Thus, interactive simulators are an effective means of formative assessment, because they are interactive, contain feedback, and they also contain elements that motivate students to further professional development.
Keywords: universal pedagogical competencies, formative assessment, pedagogical education, dialogue simulator, feedback
References:
1. Danilova L. N., Ledovskaya T. V., Molokov D. S. et al. Tsennosti pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya: istoriya i sovremennoye sostoyaniye [Values of pedagogical education: history and current state]. Ed. A. M. Khodyreva. Yaroslavl, YSPU Publ., 2020. 175 p. (in Russian).
2. Khodyrev A. M. Problema izucheniya tsennostey pedagogicheskoy deyatel’nosti [The problem of studying the values of pedagogical activity]. Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik – Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2020, no. 2(113), pp. 34–40 (in Russian).
3. Kharisova I. G., Makeyeva T. V., Kazakova E. I., Tarkhanova I. Yu. Vyyavleniye tsennostno-smyslovykh oriyentirov professional’noy pedagogicheskoy deyatel’nosti s pozitsii sotsial’no-professional’noy obshchnosti sovremennogo uchitel’stva [Identification of value-semantic orientations of professional pedagogical activity from the position of the socio-professional community of modern teaching]. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 7–26 (in Russian).
4. Brún A. De, Rogers L., Drury A. Gilmore, B. Evaluation of a formative peer assessment in research methods teaching using an online platform: A mixed methods pre-post study. Nurse Education Today, 2022, vol. 108, p. 105166.
5. Koh L. C. Academic staff perspectives of formative assessment in nurse education. Nurse Education in Practice, 2010, vol. 10, iss. 4, pp. 205–209.
6. Otto H. E., Mandorli F. Advancing formative assessment in MCAD education: The visual analytics of parametric feature-based solid models. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2021, vol. 48, p. 101308.
7. Pla-Campas G., Arumí-Prat J., Senye-Mir A. M., Ramírez E. Effect of Using Formative Assessment Techniques on Students’ Grades. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, vol. 228, pp. 190–195.
8. Gulikers J. T. M., Biemans H. J. A., Wesselink R., van der Wel M. Aligning formative and summative assessments: A collaborative action research challenging teacher conceptions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2013, vol. 39, iss. 2, рp. 116–124.
9. Gikandi J. W., Morrow D., Davis N. E. Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 2011, vol. 57, iss. 4, pp. 2333–2351.
10. Yan Z., Chiu M. M., Cheng E. C. K. Predicting teachers’ formative assessment practices: Teacher personal and contextual factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2022, vol. 114, p. 103718.
11. Yang A. C. M., Flanagan B., Ogata H. Adaptive formative assessment system based on computerized adaptive testing and the learning memory cycle for personalized learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2022, vol. 3.
12. Veugen M. J., Gulikers J. T. M., den Brok P. We agree on what we see: Teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment practice. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2021, vol. 70, p. 101027.
13. Sullivan P., McBrayer J. S., Miller S., Fallon K. An Examination of the use of computer-based formative assessments. Computers & Education, 2021, vol. 173, pp. 178–202.
14. Say R., Visentin D., Cummings E., Carr A., King C. Formative online multiple-choice tests in nurse education: An integrative review. Nurse Education in Practice, 2022, vol. 58, p. 103262.
15. Hansen G. Formative assessment as a collaborative act. Teachers` intention and students` experience: Two sides of the same coin, or? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2020, vol. 66, p. 100904.
16. Zainuddin Z., Shujahat M., Haruna H., Chu S. K.W. The role of gamified e-quizzes on student learning and engagement: An interactive gamification solution for a formative assessment system. Computers & Education, 2020, vol. 145, p. 103729.
17. Lebedeva T. N. Dialogovye trenazhery v obrazovanii [Interactive simulators in education]. Aktual’nye problemy razvitiya obshchego i vysshego obrazovaniya: XVIII mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Actual problems of development of general and higher education: XVIII interuniversity collection of scientific papers]. Chelyabinsk, Kray Ra Publ., 2022. Pp. 232–239 (in Russian).
18. Kochubey A. V., Kochubey V. V. Effektivnost’ komp’yuternogo dialogovogo trenazhera v obrazovatel’nom protsesse organizatorov zdravookhraneniya [The effectiveness of a computer interactive simulator in the educational process of health care organizers]. Virtual’nye tekhnologii v medicine – Virtual technologies in medicine, 2017, no. 1 (17), pp. 46–47 (in Russian).
19. Artyukhina M. S. Osobennosti sovremennykh sredstv obucheniya v kontekste interaktivnykh tekhnologiy [Features of modern learning tools in the context of interactive technologies]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya – Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Informatization of education, 2014, no. 2, pp. 76–81 (in Russian).
20. Molin F., Bruin A. de, Haelermans C. A. Conceptual Framework to Understand Learning Through Formative Assessments with Student Response Systems: The Role of Prompts and Diagnostic Cues. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2022, no. 6, iss. 1, р. 100323.
( 445.09 kB ) 
( 432.25 kB )
Issue: 4, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 141 — 152
Downloads: 372