Problems of reading and comprehension: from digitized text to hypertext

Borisenko Natalya Anatolyevna, Mironova Kseniya Vadimovna

DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2024-5-114-123

Information About Author:

Borisenko N. A., Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Leading Researcher, Federal Scientific Center of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research (ul. Mokhovaya, 9/4, Moscow, Russian Federation, 125009). Mironova K. V., Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Researcher, Federal Scientific Center of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research (ul. Mokhovaya, 9/4, Moscow, Russian Federation, 125009).

In the article, the problem of heterogeneity of digital reading is raised. By analogy with Milgram and Kishino’s reality-virtuality continuum, it is proposed to consider screen reading not as a single monolithic system, but as a continuum that includes many modifications. The theoretical part of the article presents a typology of types of electronic text and modifications of reading. Both simple modifications (e.g., reading digitized text) and complex ones, including reading hypertext, are analyzed. It is shown that not only reading interactive online text, but also mono-code verbal text in PDF format differs significantly from paper reading in a number of parameters. Text comprehension is considered as a key issue in the problems of digital reading. In the practical part, using a sample of students in grades 5–9, the results of an empirical study of gender and age differences in the level of understanding of monocode digitized text are presented. It was revealed that when working with paper text, girls outperform boys in reading comprehension (p ≤ 0.05), demonstrating a more attentive attitude to factual information and better coping with tasks on conceptual information. Regarding screen reading, no significant gender differences were found (p > 0.05).

Keywords: screen reading, digital reading continuum, modifications to reading, monocode text, hypertext, text comprehension, teenagers, gender and age differences

References:

1. Chteniye. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Reading. The Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Ed. Yu. P. Melent’yeva. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2021. 448 p. (in Russian).

2. Borisenko N. A. et al. Osobennosti tsifrovogo chteniya sovremennykh podrostkov: rezul’taty teoretikoempiricheskogo issledovaniya [Features of digital reading of modern teenagers: results of theoretical and empirical research]. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 5. Pp. 28–49 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.2005.02

3. Lebedeva M. Yu., Veselovskaya T. S., Kupreshchenko O. F. Osobennosti vospriyatiya i ponimaniya tsifrovykh tekstov: mezhdistsiplinarnyy vzglyad [Features of perception and understanding of digital texts: an interdisciplinary view]. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya – Prospects of science and education, 2020, no. 4, pp. 74–98 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32744/pse.2020.4.5

4. Mangen A., Walgermo B., Brønnick K. Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 2013, vol. 58, pp. 61–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002

5. Clinton V. Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 2019, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 288–324. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.12269

6. Melent’yeva Yu. P. Tsifrovoye chteniye: popytka osmysleniya [Digital reading: an attempt at comprehension]. Doklady Nauchnogo soveta po problemam chteniya RAO. Vyp. 16. Materialy postoyannogo kruglogo stola “Chteniye kak sredstvo kommunikatsii” [Reports of the Scientific Council on Reading Problems of the Russian Academy of Education. Issue 16: materials of the permanent round table “Reading as a means of communication”]. Eds Yu. P. Melent’eva, V. A. Lektorskiy. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2019. Pp. 92–95 (in Russian).

7. Milgram P., Kishino A. Taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on information and systems. E77-D, 1994, no. 12, pp. 1321–1329. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231514051_A_Taxonomy_of_Mixed_Reality_Visual_Displays (accessed 1 March 2024).

8. Skarbez R., Smith M., Whitton M.S. Revisiting Milgram and Kishino’s reality-virtuality continuum. Front. Virtual Real, 2021, vol. 2. DOI: 10.3389/frvir.2021.647997

9. Melent’yeva Yu. P. Obshhaya teoriya chteniya [General theory of reading]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2022. 304 p. (in Russian).

10. Romanicheva E. S., Prantsova G. V. Sovremennyye chitatel’skiye praktiki: obzor osnovnykh issledovaniy kak popytka klassifikatsii [Modern reading practices: a review of basic research as an attempt at classification]. Literatura v shkole – Literature at School, 2022, no. 1, pp. 92–104 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31862/0130-3414-2022-1-92-104

11. Honma M., Masaoka Y., Iizuka N., Wada S., Kamimura S., Yoshikawa A., Moriya R., Kamijo S. & Izumizaki M. Reading on a smartphone affects sigh generation, brain activity, and comprehension. Scientific Reports, 2022, vol. 12, no. 1589. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05605-0

12. Belova N. V., Rubleva E. V. Kratkiy slovar’ IT-terminov dlya spetsialistov po yazy’kovomu obrazovaniyu [A short dictionary of IT terms for language education specialists]. Saint Petersburg, Zlatoust Publ., 2017. 68 p. (in Russian).

13. DeStefano D., LeFevre J. A. Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 2007, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1616–1641. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.012

14. Zumbach J., Pixner J. Textverständlichkeit und kognitive Belastung beim Lernen mit Text und Hypertext. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 2006, no. 34 (3), Pp. 256–271.

15. Delgado P. et al. Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. In: Educational Research Review, 2018, no. 25, pp. 23–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003

16. Schwabe A. et al. No negative effects of reading on screen on comprehension of narrative texts compared to print: a meta-analysis. In: Media Psychology, 2022, vol. 25 (2), pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2022.2070216

17. Mironova K. V., Borisenko N. A., Shishkova S. V. Vozrastnaya dinamika ponimaniya teksta podrostkami 11–16 let v protsesse smy’slovogo chteniya s ekrana i s lista [Age dynamics of test comprehension in adolescents aged 11–16 in the process of semantic reading from screen and from paper]. Voprosy psychologii, 2023, no. 1, pp. 27–39 (in Russian).

18. Gal’perin I. R. Tekst kak ob’’yekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [The Text as Object of Linguistic Research]. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2007 (in Russian).

( 474.72 kB ) ( 460.19 kB )

Issue: 5, 2024

Series of issue: Issue 5

Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY

Pages: 114 — 123

Downloads: 199