The problem of artificial intelligence technology acceptance in the educational environment: Pedagogical resistance and implementation strategies
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2024-5-154-166
The article analyzes the problems of AI technology acceptance in the educational environment. The study is based on the AIDUA adoption model and includes empirical data on digital acceptance/ resistance to AI adoption by the pedagogical community. The authors identify the socio-psychological and organizational roots of pedagogical digital resistance, offering recommendations for acceleration of AI adoption in teaching practices. The results of the empirical study allow to characterize the attitudes of digital resistance to the introduction of AI technologies. Primarily, these are related to the underestimation of social influence and expectations arising from the speed of technology diffusion, concerns about the potential of using AI technologies and the possible replacement of the educational staff due to the non-anthropomorphic nature of digital assistants, and fears of losing the emotional and personal component of education. The authors also investigate the relevant factors of restraint at different levels of the pedagogical community due to the inaccessibility of necessary resources, the lack of common approaches and protocols for the use of AI technologies, resistance on the part of the pedagogical community based on the preservation of traditions and values of classical education. The proposed strategies and organizational approaches are aimed at reducing resistance and creating a favorable environmental climate conducive to the successful introduction of new technologies in the educational process. The article highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach and integrated strategy for the effective use of the potential of artificial intelligence in education.
Keywords: artificial intelligence technologies in education, diffusion of innovation, digital resistance, technology acceptance
References:
1. Kabudi T., Pappas I., Olsen D. H. AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2021, vol. 2. 12 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017
2. Deursen A. J. van, Dijk J. A. van. The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 2019, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 354–375.
3. Rogers E. M. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York, Free Press, 2003. 576 p.
4. Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 1989, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340.
5. Gursoy D., Chi O. H., Lu. L., Nunkoo R. Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management, 2019, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 157–169.
6. Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 2003, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478.
7. Kashive N., Powale L., Kashive K. Understanding user perception toward artificial intelligence (AI) enabled e-learning. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 2020, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–19.
8. Lin C. Y., Xu N. Extended TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use AI robotic architects for architectural design. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2022, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 349–362.
9. Kaplan A., Haenlein M. Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business horizons, 2019, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 15–25.
10. Zhou H., Huang M., Zhang T., Zhu X., Liu B. Emotional chatting machine: Emotional conversation generation with internal and external memory. Proceedings of The Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 730–738.
11. Song X., Xu B., Zhao Z. Can people experience romantic love for artificial intelligence? An empirical study of intelligent assistants. Information & Management, 2022, vol. 59, no. 2, 10 p. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2022.103595 (accessed 2 March 2024).
12. Kelly S., Kaye Sh., Oviedo-Trespalacios O. What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 2023, vol. 77. 33 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925
13. Behl A., Chavan M., Jain K., Sharma I., Pereira V. E., Zhang J. Z. The role of organizational culture and voluntariness in the adoption of artificial intelligence for disaster relief operations. International Journal of Manpower, 2022, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 569–586.
14. Koroleva D. O., Andreeva A. A., Khavenson T. E. Shokovaya innovatsiya: kontseptualizatsiya protsessa tsifrovoy transformatsii obrazovaniya v period pandemii [Shock innovation: conceptualization of the process of digital transformation of education during the pandemic]. Obrazovaniye i samorazvitiye – Education and selfdevelopment, 2023, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 100–117 (in Russian). DOI: 10.26907/esd.18.2.08
15. Koroleva D. O., Naushirvanov T. O. Digital countries. Osobennosti tsifrovizatsii obrazovaniya v Rossii, Vengrii i Germanii [Digital countries. Features of digitalization of education in Russia, Hungary and Germany]. Obrazovatel’naya politika – Educational Policy, 2021, no. 3 (87), pp. 106–118 (in Russian). DOI: 10.22394/2078-838X-2021-3-106-118
16. Gansser O. A., Reich C. S. A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application. Technology in Society, 2021, vol. 65. 15 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101535
17. Chatterjee S., Bhattacharjee K. K. Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: a quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 2020, vol. 25, pp. 3443–3463.
18. Tran K., Nguyen T. Preliminary research on the social attitudes toward AI’s involvement in Christian education in Vietnam: promoting AI technology for religious education. Religions, vol. 12, no. 3, 20 p. doi: 10.3390/rel12030208
19. Sidorova T. A. Obrazy vospriyatiya i kontseptualizatsiya antropologicheskikh vyzovov iskusstvennogo intellekta [Images of perception and conceptualization of anthropological challenges of artificial intelligence]. Praxema. Problemy vizualnoy semiotiki – Praxema. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 2024, vol. 1 (39), pp. 102–119 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2024-1-102-119
20. Valeev A. S., Khudayberdina S. R., Valeeva G. H. Otsenka otnosheniya pedagogov organizatsiy vysshego i srednego professional’nogo obrazovaniya k innovatsiyam v upravlenii obrazovaniem [Assessment of the attitude of teachers of higher and secondary vocational education organizations to innovations in education management]. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psikhologiya – World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology, 2016, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 12 (in Russian).
( 631.83 kB ) 
( 614.89 kB )
Issue: 5, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 154 — 166
Downloads: 193