Pedagogical innovation competitions as drivers and institutions for supporting digital initiatives of innovative teachers
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2024-6-50-62
The article examines the role of pedagogical innovation competitions as a mechanism for supporting and accompanying digital initiatives of teachers in the context of digitalization of education. Using the example of the Competition for Innovation in Education, the key areas of digital projects aimed at transforming educational practice are analyzed. The main categories of presented projects are identified, among which interactive educational platforms and blended learning technologies dominate. A significant part of the projects is aimed at complementing traditional educational methods through digitalization. Methods for accelerating innovative projects are considered, as well as their contribution to the professional development of teachers and the formation of an innovative educational community. The theoretical significance of the article is to expand the understanding of the mechanisms for supporting digital transformation in education and the role of competitions in the development of design thinking and an innovative culture among teachers. The article shows how innovation competitions stimulate the implementation of grassroots educational innovations, provide support in the form of resources and expertise, and also form an ecosystem of interaction between participants.
Keywords: digitalization of education, educational innovation competitions, innovative projects, interactive educational platforms, pedagogical innovations, innovation competitions, project acceleration, design thinking
References:
1. Bermus A. G. Aktual’nyye problemy pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya v epokhu tsifrovoy transformatsii: teoreticheskiy obzor [Actual problems of pedagogical education in the era of digital transformation: a theoretical review]. Pedagogika. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Pedagogy. Issues of theory and practice, 2022, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–10 (in Russian).
2. Natsional’nyye proyekty Rossii. Proyekt “Tsifrovaya ekonomika”. Opisaniye [National projects of Russia. Project “Digital Economy”. Description] (in Russian). URL: https://digital.gov.ru/ru/activity/directions/858/#sectiondescription (accessed 16 September 2024).
3. Rogers E. M. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York. Free Press, 2003. 576 p. ISBN 0-7432-5823-1.
4. Taber K. S. Mediated Learning Leading Development – The Social Development Theory of Lev Vygotsky. Science Education in Theory and Practice. Springer, Cham., 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_19
5. Bui Hong T. M. Senge’s Learning Organization: Development of the Learning Organization Model, in Anders Ragnar Örtenblad (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Learning Organization, Oxford Handbooks (2019; online edn, Oxford Academic, 8 Jan. 2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198832355.013.8
6. Mishra P., Koehler M. J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 2006, vol. 108 (6), pp. 1017–1054. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
7. Bondarenko V. V., Polutin S. V., Yudina V. A. et al. Vliyaniye tsifrovoy transformatsii sistemy rossiyskogo vysshego obrazovaniya na neobkhodimost’ razvitiya kompetentsiy i kar’yernogo prodvizheniya nauchno-pedagogicheskikh rabotnikov [Impact of digital transformation of the Russian higher education system on the need to develop competences and career development of scientific and pedagogical employees]. Integratsiya obrazovaniya – Integration of education, 2023, vol. 27, no. 3 (112), pp. 490–505 (in Russian).
8. Klarin M. V. Paradoksy innovatsionnoy obrazovatel’noy praktiki: vyzovy i vyvody dlya teorii nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya [Paradoxes of innovative educational practice: challenges and conclusions for the theory of lifelong education]. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V. P. Astaf’yeva (Vestnik KGPU) – Bulletin of the Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after. V. P. Astafieva (KGPU Bulletin), 2014, no. 1(27), pp. 6–18 (in Russian).
9. Stumbrienу D., Jevsikova T., Kontvaine V. Key factors infuencing teachers’ motivation to transfer technology – enabled educational innovation. Education and Information Technologies, 2024, vol. 29, pp. 1697–1731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11891-6
10. McConnell M., Montplaisir L., Offerdahl E. A model of peer effects on instructor innovation adoption. International Journal of STEM Education. 2020. Ed. 7. Article number: 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00255-y
11. Zemlina E. M. Akseleratsionnyye programmy kak sredstvo formirovaniya gotovnosti studentov k predprinimatel’skoy deyatel’nosti [Acceleration programs as a means of developing students’ readiness for entrepreneurial activity]. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya – Problems of modern teacher education, 2020, no. 69-4, pp. 107–110 (in Russian).
12. Njoku C., Green Hofer S., Sathyamoorthy G., Patel N., Potts H. W. The role of accelerator programmes in supporting the adoption of digital health technologies: A qualitative study of the perspectives of small- and medium-sized enterprises. Digit Health, 2023, vol. 9, 10 p. DOI: 10.1177/20552076231173303
13. Shakhova N. V., Petukhova A. N. Vliyaniye voznagrazhdeniy na innovatsionnoye povedeniye rabotnikov [The influence of rewards on the innovative behavior of employees]. Vestnik PNIPU. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye nauki – Bulletin of PNIPU. Socio-economic sciences, 2012, no. 16, pp. 164–173 (in Russian).
14. Berdashkevich A. P. Ob utochnenii ponyatiya “grant” v rossiyskom zakonodatel’stve [On clarifying the concept of “grant” in Russian legislation]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gumanitarnogo nauchnogo fonda – Bulletin of the Russian Humanitarian Scientific Foundation, 2003, vol. 3, pp. 8–19 (in Russian).
15. Best Practices in Education Grant Making. The Center on Philanthropy Indiana University, 2009. URL: https://scholarworks.indianapolis.iu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/863d67d8-e909-43dc-8b2b-903448e38480/content (accessed 18 September 2024).
16. Romrell D., Kidder L. K., Wood E. The SAMR Model as a Framework for Evaluating mLearning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 2014, vol. 18, no. 2, 15 p. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i2.435
17. Pomulev A. A. Iskusstvennyy intellekt kak ob’’yekt stoimostnoy otsenki [Artificial intelligence as an object of cost estimation]. Imushchestvennyye otnosheniya v RF – Property relations in the Russian Federation, 2022, no. 6 (249), pp. 42–56 (in Russian).
18. Voronin D. M. Ispol’zovaniye instrumentov rasshirennoy real’nosti v obrazovatel’nom protsesse [Use of augmented reality tools in the educational process]. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya – Problems of modern pedagogical education, 2022, no. 74-3, pp. 51–55 (in Russian).
19. Asmolov A. G., Gusel’tseva M. S. O tsennostnom smysle sotsiokul’turnoy modernizatsii obrazovaniya: ot reform – k reformatsii [On the value sense of the socio-cultural modernization of education: from reforms to reformation]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. Obrazovaniye – Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: Psychology. Pedagogy. Education, 2019, no. 1, pp. 18–43 (in Russian).
20. Korolyova D. Genezis i prognoznyy potentsial ekosistemnogo podkhoda v obrazovanii [Genesis and predictive potential of the ecosystem approach in education]. Forsayt – Foresight, 2023, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 93–109.
( 426.3 kB ) 
( 411.92 kB )
Issue: 6, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: METHODOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION
Pages: 50 — 62
Downloads: 26