Written analytical work as a form of midterm assessment of the results of studying basic historical disciplines by students of the Faculty of History and Philology of TSPU
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2024-6-80-92
The article considers the problem of choosing forms of midterm assessment in a university that are adequate to the tasks of higher education at the present stage, primarily taking into account the competence approach. The need to take into account such factors and learning outcomes as professional suitability and motivation of graduates of pedagogical specialties is indicated. It is noted that there is a lack of specialized literature on the problems of intermediate assessment, especially in history. The author describes his own experience of conducting midterm assessment in basic historical disciplines – the history of the Middle Ages and the modern history of Asian and African countries – in the form of written analytical work. The methodology of preparation for writing this work is disclosed, the principles of formulating questions for examination tickets are explained. The described experience is analyzed from the point of view of its role in the formation of professional knowledge, skills and abilities of history students. The potential possibility of developing functional literacy in students, namely reading literacy and global competence, is shown using the proposed methodology. A brief critical analysis of the described methodology of midterm assessment is given in comparison with examples available in pedagogical literature.
Keywords: general history, methods of teaching history, midterm assessment, functional literacy, global competence, history of the Middle Ages, Modern history of the countries of Asia and Africa
References:
1. Bugaev K. V. Sistema otsenivaniya uspevayemosti studentov: problemy i perspektivy [Student Performance Assessment System: Problems and Prospects]. Vestnik Sibirskogo instituta biznesa i informatsionnykh tekhnologiy – Herald of Siberian Institute of Business and Information Technologies, 2017, no. 2 (22), pp. 107–113 (in Russian).
2. Kon E. F., Freyman V. I., Yuzhakov A. A. Problema otsenki kachestva obucheniya v vuzakh s sistemoy podgotovki “bakalavr – magistr” (na primere tekhnicheskih napravleniy [The problem of assessing the quality of education in universities with the “bachelor – master” training system (using technical fields as an example)]. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye – Open education, 2013, no. 1 (96), pp. 23–31 (in Russian).
3. Kal’yar M. N., Akhmad B., Kal’yar Kh. Vliyayet li motivatsiya uchitelya na motivatsiyu uchashchegosya? Oposreduyushchaya rol’ professional’nogo povedeniya pedagoga [Does Teacher Motivation Affect Student Motivation? The Mediating Role of Teacher Professional Behavior]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies, 2018, no. 3, pp. 91–119 (in Russian).
4. Polozheniye o provedenii tekushchego kontrolya uspevayemosti i promezhutochnoy attestatsii obuchayushchikhsya [Regulations on the current monitoring of academic performance and midterm assessment of students] (in Russian). URL: https://sveden.tspu.edu.ru/api/svfile/2411 (accessed 10 September 2024).
5. Tyut’kova E. A. Pedagogicheskiy tezaurus [Pedagogical Thesaurus]. Moscow, Institut nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya Publ., 2016. 160 p. (in Russian).
6. Voronin A. S. Slovar’ terminov po obshchey i sotsial’noy pedagogike: uchebnoye elektronnoye tekstovoye izdaniye [Dictionary of terms on general and social pedagogy: educational electronic text publication]. Ekaterinburg, Ural State Technical University Publ., 2006. 135 p. (in Russian).
7. Grishenko V. D. Problema otsenivaniya v vuze [The problem of assessment in the university]. Yazyk: kategorii, funktsii, rechevoye deystviye. Materialy XIII mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii: v 2-kh chastyakh [Language: categories, functions, speech act. Proceedings of the XIII international scientific conference: in 2 parts]. Kolomna, State Social and Humanitarian University Publ., 2020, Issue 13, part I. Pp. 36–40 (in Russian).
8. Shakirova D. M., Rudik G. A., Lushpayeva I. I. Funktsional’naya gramotnost’. Chast’ I [Functional Literacy Part I]. Kazan, Institute for Education Development of the Republic of Tatarstan Publ., 2020. Vol. 3 (7). 87 p. (in Russian).
9. Shilina G. N., Gerashchenko S. M. Formirovaniye universal’nykh uchebnykh deystviy v podgotovke studentov 1 kursa arkhitekturnykh spetsial’nostey [Formation of universal educational activities in the preparation of first-year students of architectural specialties]. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya – Modern problems of science and education, 2018, no. 3 (in Russian). URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=27590 (accessed 30 September 2024).
10. Marinova A. A., Egorova G. I. Upravleniye kachestvom formirovaniya funktsional’noy gramotnosti shkol’nikov v setevom vzaimodeystvii [Quality management of the formation of functional literacy of schoolchildren in network interaction]. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoye obozreniye – Pedagogical Review, 2024, no. 4 (56), pp. 7–14 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2024-4-7-14
11. Krolivetskaya I. E., Ostapenko I. A. Ekzamen kak osnovnaya forma rubezhnogo kontrolya v vuze [Examination as the main form of midterm control in the university]. Nauchno-metodicheskiy elektronnyy zhurnal “Kontsept” – Scientific and methodological electronic journal “Koncept”, 2016, vol. 23, pp. 22–27 (in Russian). URL: http://ekoncept.ru/2016/56385.htm (accessed 22 September 2024).
12. Belova S. N. Ball’no-reytingovaya sistema otsenki kachestva osvoyeniya osnovnoy obrazovatel’noy programmy vysshego obrazovaniya [Point-rating system for assessing the quality of mastering the main educational program of higher education]. Natsional’naya assotsiatsiya uchyonykh (NAU) – National Association of Scientists (NAS), 2015, no. 2 (7), pp. 31–34 (in Russian).
13. Tojnbi A. Dzh. Postizheniye istorii [A Study of History]. Moscow, Iris press Publ., 2010. 640 p. (in Russian).
14. Mukhin O. N. Osobennosti prepodavaniya Novoy istorii stran Azii i Afriki dlya studentov-istorikov v Tomskom gosudarstvennom pedagogicheskom universitete [Features of teaching Modern History of Asian and African countries for history students at Tomsk State Pedagogical University]. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoye obozreniye – Pedagogical review, 2020, vol. 4, pp. 83–90 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2020-4-83-90
15. Korsunskiy A. R., Gyunter R. Upadok i gibel’ Zapadnoy Rimskoy imperii i vozniknoveniye germanskikh korolevstv (do serediny VI v.) [The decline and fall of the Western Roman Empire and the emergence of the German kingdoms (until the middle of the 6th century)]. Moscow, MSU Publ., 1984. 256 p. (in Russian).
16. Koval’ T. V., Dyukova S. E. Global’nyye kompetentsii – novyy komponent funktsional’noy gramotnosti [Global competencies – a new component of functional literacy]. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika – Domestic and foreign pedagogy, 2019, vol. 1, no. 4 (61), pp. 112–123 (in Russian).
17. Turchen D. N. Universal’nyye uchebnyye deystviya kak faktor obespecheniya preemstvennosti srednego i vysshego obrazovaniya [Universal educational activities as a factor in ensuring the continuity of secondary and higher education]. Istoricheskaya i sotsial’no-obrazovatel’naya mysl’ – Historical and socio-educational thought, 2013, no. 2 (18), pp. 106–110 (in Russian).
18. Kovtun E. N., Rodionova S. E. Promezhutochnaya i itogovaya attestatsiya pri kompetentnostnom podkhode: primeneniye innovatsionnykh obrazovatel’nykh tekhnologiy [Intermediate and final assessment with a competency- based approach: application of innovative educational technologies]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Filologiya. Zhurnalistika – News of Saratov University. New series. Series: Philology. Journalism, 2013, vol. 13, issue 4, pp. 109–112 (in Russian).
19. Panova I. V. Metod proyektov v sisteme kontrolya dostizheniy studentov pedagogicheskogo vuza [Project method in the system of monitoring the achievements of students of a pedagogical university]. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta – Bulletin of Minin University, 2016, no. 2, pp. 67–70 (in Russian).
20. Bazayeva F. U., Kolomiyets O. M. Metodologicheskoye osnovaniye razrabotki igrovykh formatov promezhutochnoy attestatsii v vuze [Methodological basis for the development of game formats for midterm assessment in a university]. Mir nauki, kul’tury i obrazovaniya – World of science, culture and education, 2024, no. 1 (104), pp. 347–350 (in Russian).
21. Popkov V. A. Opyt reytingovoy otsenki znaniy studentov [Experience of rating assessment of students’ knowledge]. Pedagogika – Pedagogy, 1998, no. 8, pp. 51–55 (in Russian).
( 409 kB ) 
( 395.35 kB )
Issue: 6, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: THEORY AND METHODS OF TEACHING AND EDUCATION
Pages: 80 — 92
Downloads: 33