Development and validation of the questionnaire “Assessment of pedagogical conservatism”
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2025-1-93-112
The article presents a description and results of the development, validation and standardization of an original methodology for assessing pedagogical conservatism. The study, aimed at identifying the psychometric characteristics of the new technique, involved 379 people aged 21 to 65 years, of which 204 were women, 175 were men (sample 1); to verify convergent validity, the study participants included 379 respondents (sample 2); To assess test-retest reliability, 105 people took part (sample 3). In the group from 25 to 35 years old, the number of women was 50 people, men – 41 people; in the group from 36 to 44 years old, the number of women was 54 people, men – 43 people; in the group from 45 to 55 years old, the number of women was 51 people, men – 49 people; in the group from 56 to 65 years old, the number of women was 49 people, men – 42 people. The developed methodology includes 7 scales and 43 questions: objective factor, subjective factor, motivational, cognitive, emotional, communicative, behavioral components, which are assessed based on the indicators presented in them on a five-point scale, which allows us to determine the level of pedagogical conservatism. In the process of developing a hypothetical construct of the methodology, a theoretical analysis of scientific approaches to the subject of research was carried out, the content of the phenomenon of pedagogical conservatism was revealed. The article presents the text of the methodology, keys, interpretation of the results, data on the normalization of the sample on the basis of which the study was constructed. The results of the study confirm the high level of reliability, reliability, and validity of the questionnaire, which allows us to present it as a reasonable and suitable psychodiagnostic tool for studying the psychological characteristics and level of manifestation of pedagogical conservatism of teachers of higher educational institutions, secondary vocational institutions, and general education institutions in the process of psychological and pedagogical support pedagogical activities.
Keywords: pedagogical conservatism, teacher, reliability, convergence, validity, standardization
References:
1. Avakyan I. B., Vinogradova G. А. Evaluation of Innovative Readiness of Teaching Staff of Universities. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya – Psychological-Educational Studies, 2020, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 16–30 (in Russian). doi: 10.17759/psyedu.2020120102 (accessed 04 June 2024).
2. Silakova L. V., Sosnilo A. I. Issledovaniye gotovnosti uchastnikov obrazovatel’nogo protsessa k primeneniyu tsifrovykh tekhnologiy v obrazovanii [Study of the Educational Process Participants Readiness to Applying Digital Technologies in Education. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye – Psychological Science and Education, 2023, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 112–133 (in Russian). doi: https://doi.org/10.17759/ pse.2023280407 (accessed 04 June 2024).
3. Avakyan I. B., Miniyarov V. M. Pedagogicheskiy konservatizm prepodavatelya vuza v usloviyakh professional’nogo stressa [Conservatism of a university teacher under conditions of professional stress]. Nauchnyy rezul’tat. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya – Research result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 2024, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 63–82(in Russian). doi: 10.18413/2313-8971-2024-10-1-0-5 (accessed 04 June 2024).
4. Shcherbakova T. N., Stashkova T. V., Ryagin S. N. Destruktsii lichnosti v professional’noy sfere: sub’’ektivnyy kontrol’ kak faktor ikh preodoleniya [Personality destruction in the professional sphere: subjective control as a factor in overcoming them]. Rossiyskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Russian Psychological Journal, 2024, no. 21(1), pp. 302–317. doi: https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2024.1.16 (in Russian)
5. Potapova E. V., Anikina M. A., Chisto R. S., Gudovskiy I. V., Shepeleva Yu. S. Issledovaniye vzaimosvyazi trevozhnosti i sotsiometricheskogo statusa pedagogov sredney shkoly [Study of the relationship between anxiety and the sociometric status of secondary school teachers]. Psikholog, 2023, no. 1, pp. 65–76 (in Russian). doi: 10.25136/2409-8701.2023.1.39596 (accessed 04 June 2024).
6. Feoktistova S. V., Krivosheeva E. V. Sostoyaniye frustratsii pedagogov v usloviyakh modernizatsii obrazovatel’noy sredy [The state of frustration of teachers in the context of modernization of the educational environme]. Vestnik TvGU. Seriya “Pedagogika i psikhologiya” – Herald of Tver State University. Series: Pedagogy and Psycholofy, 2018, vol. 7, pp. 72–76 (in Russian).
7. Avakyan I. B. Stremleniye k samorazvitiyu kak faktor innovatsionnoy gotovnosti prepodavateley vuzov [The desire for self-development as a factor in the innovative readiness of university teachers]. Obrazovaniye i samorazvitiye, 2020, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 88–102 (in Russian). doi: 10.26907/esd15.2.08 (accessed 04 June 2024).
8. Rubantsova T. A., Krut’ko E. A. Protsessy otchuzhdeniya v sovremennom professional’nom obrazovanii [Processes of alienation in modern professional education]. Professional’noye obrazovaniye v sovremennom mire, 2018, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2018–2023 (in Russian). doi: 10.15372/PEMW20180307 (accessed 04 June 2024).
9. Weitze C. L. Designing pedagogical innovation for collaborating teacher teams. Journal of Education forTeaching, 2017, vol. 43(3), pp. 361–373. doi: 10.1080/02607476.2017.1319511 (accessed 04 June 2024).
10. Avakyan I. B. K voprosu ob innovatsionnoy gotovnosti i sotsial’no-psikhologicheskom klimate vuzov [On the issue of innovative readiness and the socio-psychological climate of universities]. Obrazovaniye i nauka – Education and Science, 2018, no. 4, pp. 114–131 (in Russian). doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2018-4-114-131 (accessed 04 June 2024).
11. Koeslag-Kreunen M. G. M., Van der Klink Marcel R. Van den Bossche Piet, Gijselaers Wim H. Leadership for team learning: the case of university teacher teams. Higher Education, 2018, vol. 75, pp. 191–207. doi: 10.1007/s10734-017-0126 (accessed 04 June 2024).
12. Wang P., Hao Y. What Role Does Error Orientation Play in the Relationship Between Error Management Climate and Innovative Behavior? 2nd International Conference on Education, Management and Systems Engineering (EMSE 2017), 2017. Pp. 265–271. 2475-0042. DOI: 10.12783/dtssehs/emse2017/12780 (accessed 04 June 2024).
13. Shigartsova A. A. Psikhologicheskoye blagopoluchiye i udovletvorennost’ professiey sovremennogo uchitelya [Psychological well-being and satisfaction with the profession of a modern teacher]. StudArctic Forum, 2021, no. 2 (22), pp. 59–65 (in Russian).
14. Klimenko L. V., Skachkova L. S. Sub’yektivnoye blagopoluchiye prepodavateley rossiyskikh vuzov: opyt impiricheskogo issledovaniya [Subjective Well-Being of Russian Faculty: An Empirical Study]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Educational Studies Moscow, 2020, no. 4, pp. 37–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-20204-37-63 (accessed 04 June 2024).
15. Vinogradova G. A., Chapala T. V., Ilich M. Fizicheskoye blagopoluchiye pedagogov kak faktor effektivnosti professional’noy deyatel’nosti [Physical well-being of teachers as a factor in the effectiveness of professional activity]. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Seria: Istoriya, pedagogika, filologiya – Vestnik of Samara university. History, pedagogics, philology, 2020, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 79–83. doi: http://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2020-26-2-79-83 (in Russian).
16. Artyukhina A. I., Tret’yak S. V., Velikanov V. V. Tvorcheskoye razvitiye pedagoga v obrazovatel’noy srede universiteta [Creative development of a teacher in the educational environment of the university]. Obrazovatel’nyy vestnik “Soznaniye” – Educational Bulletin “Consciousness”, 2021, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 4–11. doi: 10.26787/nydha-2686-6846-2021-23-5-4-11 (in Russian).
17. Volchenko D. Yu. Razvitiye tvorcheskogo potentsiala pedagoga kak osnova sovershenstvovaniya pedagogicheskogo masterstva [Development of a teacher’s creative potential as the basis for improving pedagogical skills]. Molodoy uchenyy, 2019, no. 32 (270), pp. 137–141 (in Russian). URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/270/62004/ (accessed 24 April 2024).
18. Mel’nikova M. L. Koping-strategii i zashchitnye mekhanizmy lichnosti studentov-pedagogov [Coping strategies and personal protective mechanisms of student teachers]. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2020, no. 2, pp. 84–98 (in Russian). doi: 10.26170/po20-02-10 (accessed 04 June 2024)
19. Vyboyshchik I. V., Shakurova Z. A. Lichnostnyy mnogofaktornyy oprosnik R. Kettella [Cattell’s multifactor personality questionnaire]. Chelyabinsk, YUUrGU Publ., 2000. 54 p. (in Russian).
20. Zaytseva S. A., Malakhova O. N., Russkikh I. T. Rol’ diagnostiki samootsenki psikhicheskikh sostoyaniy studentov mladshikh kursov agrarnogo universiteta [The role of diagnosing self-assessment of mental states of junior year students at an agricultural university]. Studia Humanitatis, 2023, no. 1, pp. 1–11 (in Russian).
21. Vodop’yanova N. E., Starchenkova E. S., Nasledov A. D. Standartizirovannyy oprosnik “Professiona’noye vygoraniye” dlya spetsialistov sotsionomicheskikh professiy [Standardized questionnaire “Professional burnout” for specialists in socionomic professions]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburskogo universiteta. Seria: Sotsiologiya – Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 2013, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 17–27 (in Russian).
22. Shlyapnikova I. A., Timoshchenko A. S. Opredeleniye urovnya udovletvorennosti trudom rabotnikov elektro-setevoy organizatsii [Determining the level of job satisfaction of employees of an electric grid organization]. Innovatsii v nauke, 2017, no. 9(70), pp. 43–46 (in Russian).
23. Fetiskin N. P., Kozlov V. V., Manuylov G. M. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp [Socio-psychological diagnostics of personality development and small groups]. Moscow, Institute of Psychotherapy Publ., 2002. Pp. 444–452 (in Russian).
24. Stepanova T. V. Issledovaniye motivatsii uspekha i motivatsii boyazni neudachi v strukture uchebnoy motivatsii studentov vuza [Study of motivation for success and motivation for fear of failure in the structure of educational motivation of university students]. Vestnik Kuzbasskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, 2004, no. 6.2(44), pp. 144–145 (in Russian).
25. Kornilova T. V., Chumakova M. A. Shkaly tolerantnosti intolerantnosti k neopredelennosti v modifikatsii oprosnika C. Badnera [Scales of tolerance and intolerance to uncertainty in a modification of the S. Badner questionnaire]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya – Experimental Psychology, 2014, no. 1, pp. 92–110 (in Russian).
( 923.91 kB ) 
( 676.91 kB )
Issue: 1, 2025
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 93 — 112
Downloads: 112