Anti-victim and risk-oriented thinking as competencies of a university graduate
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2025-1-122-130
The issues of formation and development of competencies for solving professional problems using algorithms of victimization, anti-victimization and risk-oriented types of thinking among university students are considered. The current approach in psychological science to dividing thinking operations into universal (analysis, synthesis, etc.) and disciplinary (subject-specific) specific to a particular scientific discipline is being updated. It is shown that risk-oriented (or risky) and anti-victim types of thinking occupy a special place in this established classification. The objective operations that make up these types of thinking can be radically different from each other, despite the fact that both types of thinking are focused on solving problems under conditions of uncertainty, aggravated by factors of danger to the person or his property. The author's methodology for developing the skills to distinguish between victim, anti-victim and risk-oriented thinking is proposed. The participants of the study were second-year students of Yelets State University, 40 people. The methods used were experiment and group interview. It was found that students mostly made mistakes in solving problems to identify the type of thinking that people used when solving ambiguous situations recorded in educational cases. Moreover, even when solving problems correctly, students were not always able to formulate criteria for distinguishing one type of thinking from another. Errors manifested themselves in the failure to distinguish between risk-oriented thinking and victim, anti-victim and risk-oriented. Most often, errors were recorded when solving problems involving older people. It is concluded that it is necessary to include competencies in anti-victim thinking in educational standards.
Keywords: competencies, risk-oriented thinking, anti-victim thinking, universal thinking operations, objective thinking operations, old age
References:
1. Piaget J. Psikhologiya intellekta [Psychology of intelligence]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2004. 192 p. (in Russian).
2. Barton K.C., Levstiket L.S. Teaching History for the Common Good. New York, 2004. 300 p.
3. Liu S., Li C. Promoting design thinking and creativity by making: A quasi-experiment in the information technology course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2023. vol. 49. September, 101335. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1871187123001049 (accessed 9 March 2024).
4. Kessner T. M., Harris L. M. Opportunities to practice historical thinking and reasoning in a made-for-school history-oriented videogame. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2022, vol. 34. December, 100545. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212868922000630 (accessed 9 March 2024).
5. Maller C. Re-orienting nature-based solutions with more-than-human thinking. Cities, 2021, vol. 113. June, 103155, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264275121000536 (accessed 9 March 2024).
6. Galperin P.Ya. Metody obucheniya i umstvennoye razvitiye rebenka [Teaching methods and mental development of the child]. Moscow, MSU Publ., 1985. 45 p. (in Russian).
7. Le H. V., Chong S. L. The Dynamics of Critical Thinking Skills: A Phenomenographic Exploration from Malaysian and Vietnamese Undergraduates. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2024, vol. 51, March, 101445. URL: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6704-7194 (accessed 9 March 2024).
8. Facione P. A. Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Ed.: Measured Reasons LLC, Hermosa Beach. California (USA), 2015. 30 p.
9. Stevenson J. C., Akram U. Self-critical thinking mediates the relationship between perfectionism and perceived stress in undergraduate students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, 2022, vol. 10. December, 100438, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915322001305 (accessed 9 March 2024).
10. Ishmail D. M., Memba F., Muriithi J. Credit Risk and Financial Perfomance of Microfinance Banks in Kenya. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 2023, vol. 14(1), pp. 67–74.
11. Brisinda D., Fenici P., Fenici R. Police Realistic Tactical Training Is Not Risk-Free: Stress-Induced Wide-QRS Paroxysmal Tachyarrhythmia in a Healthy Police Officer and Professional Athlete. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 2024, vol. 39, no. 4. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11896-023-09616-z (accessed 29 February 2024).
12. Lirios C. G. Specification a Model for Study of Policies Risk. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies, 2022, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–10.
13. Freudenburg W.R. Risky thinking: facts, values and blind spots in societal decisions about risks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2021, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 125–130. DOI:10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00013-8
14. Spector A., Orrell M., Woods B. Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST): effects on different areas of cognitive function for people with dementia. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2010, vol. 12 (25), pp. 1253–1258.
15. Budyakova T. P. Viktimologicheskiye aspekty pravovogo instituta kompensatsii moral’nogo vreda [Victimological aspects of the legal institution of compensation for moral damage]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2016. 224 p. (in Russian).
16. Kornienko D. S., Baleva M. V., Yachmeneva N. P. Vybor riska: namereniye protiv deystviya [Risk Choice: Intention vs. Action]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya – Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2023, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 87–100. doi: 10.17759/exppsy.2023160105 (in Russian).
17. Zhang Y., Wu Y., Li Y. Sex differences in the mediating effect of resilience on social support and cognitive function in older adults. Geriatric Nursing, 2023, vol. 53, pp. 50–56.
18. Naumova V. A., Glozman Zh. M. The Phenomenon of Loneliness in Old Age. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 2021, no. 14(3), pp. 147–165. doi: 10.11621/pir.2021.0310
Issue: 1, 2025
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 122 — 130
Downloads: 127