METHODOLOGICAL SUPPORT OF YOUNG SPECIALISTS IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2021-6-132-139
The article is devoted to the study of the experience of foreign countries in terms of organizing methodological support for young specialists in the educational sphere. Authors determined that the system of methodological support is a structural element of advanced training for teachers who begin their professional education and should take into account modern trends in the development of education, based on research on new pedagogical functions that arise in the context of informatization of education. The introduction of a new concept into the educational process entails a number of innovative transformations in the content of education, in rethinking new concepts, categories, values of thinking, changes in the role positions: mentor, teacher, tutor. A modern teacher is a specialist who carries out pedagogical activity taking into accounts the requirements of the time, constantly improving his professional competence, and his pedagogical activity is intellectual, creative activity aimed at teaching, upbringing and personal development. Every young teacher should be a professional in his activity, since the product of this activity should be a competitive graduate of an educational institution, endowed with key competencies. That is why young teachers, through an effective system of methodological support, must master a number of competencies produced by the experience of professionals with extensive experience in the practical application of knowledge and skills to ensure effective educational activities.
Keywords: methodological support, young specialist, teacher, professional development of a teacher
References:
1. Novikova T., Lazareva M., Nikulina N. Mentorskoye soprovozhdeniye upravlencheskikh kadrov: zarubezhnyy opyt [Mentoring support of management personnel: foreign experience]. Profil’naya shkola, 2017, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 35–47 (in Russian).
2. Abraham S. Crafting a pedagogical third space in a transnational teacher education project. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2020, vol. 97, pp. 103–117.
3. Sergeyeva M. G. Tyutorskoye soprovozhdeniye v sisteme professional’nogo obrazovaniya: zarubezhnaya i rossiyskaya praktika [Tyyutorsky maintenance in the system of professional education: foreign and russian practice]. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya, 2019, no. 63-1, pp. 298–301 (in Russian).
4. McDuff D. R., Morse E. D., White R. K. Professional and Collegiate Team Assistance Programs: Services and Utilization Patterns. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 2005, vol. 24, is. 4, pp. 943–958.
5. Bocoş M., Şerbănescu L. Online Procedures for Quality Assurance in Implementation of Life-long Training Program for Mentors and Assistance for Debutant Teaching Professionals. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 180, pp. 958–965.
6. Blokker R., Akkermans J., Khapova S. Building a sustainable start: The role of career competencies, career success, and career shocks in young professionals’ employability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2019, vol. 112, pp. 172–184.
7. Woulfin S.L., Jones B. Special development: The nature, content, and structure of special education teachers’ professional learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2021, vol. 100, pp. 254–277.
8. Pate A., Smith J., Zagar M. Development, implementation, and impact of a collaborative junior faculty engagement and professional growth program: The Young Faculty Leadership Initiative. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 2017, vol. 10, is. 3, pp. 352–359.
9. Straub R., Vilsmaier U. Pathways to educational change revisited– controversies and advances in the German teacher education system. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2020, vol. 96, pp. 23–40.
10. Kovaleva T. M., Kobyshcha E. I., Popova (Smolik) S. Yu., Terov A. A., CHeredilina M. Yu. Professiya «tyutor» [The tutor profession]. Moscow-Tver, «SFK-ofis» Publ., 2012. 246 p. (in Russian).
11. Rutten L. Toward a theory of action for practitioner inquiry as professional development in preservice teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2020, vol. 97, pp. 177–194.
12. Ignat’yeva L. V. Spetsifika pedagogicheskoy modeli soprovozhdeniya professional’nogo stanovleniya molodykh spetsialistov kak faktor povysheniya kachestva ikh raboty [The specificity of the pedagogical model supporting the professional development of young experts as a factor in improving the quality of their work]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya – The world of science, culture, education, 2018, no. 1 (68), pp. 162–164 (in Russian).
13. Perevezentseva O. N., Belyakova T. A. Tyutorskoye soprovozhdeniye: zarubezhnyy i rossiyskiy opyt [Tutor support of students’ information activities]. Voprosy pedagogiki, 2019, no. 2, pp. 78–81 (in Russian).
( 371.62 kB ) 
( 363.11 kB )
Issue: 6, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: COMPARATIVE EDUCATION
Pages: 132 — 139
Downloads: 609