Pedagogical review
RU EN






Today: 26.06.2026
Home Search
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Issues
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted article
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
EBSCO
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Search

- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

#SearchDownloads
1

REVIEW OF THE MONOGRAPH: BOGUSLAVSKY M. V., SANAEV S. Z. “MIKHAIL NIKOLAYEVICH SKATKIN ’S PEDAGOGICAL SYSTEM: GENESIS AND MEANING” (Moscow, 2018. 258 p.) // Pedagogical Review. 2021. Issue 1 (35). P. 169-173

.

1770
2

Continuous professional development of teachers: history, current state, and prospects // Pedagogical Review. 2026. Issue 3 (67). P. 29-40

The continuous professional development of teachers is of strategic importance for building a highly effective education system. This study examines the development of the Russian system of continuous teacher education from the mid-19th to the first quarter of the 21st century, characterizing its forms, identifying trends, defining problems, and suggesting prospects for its future development. The paper demonstrates that the formation of the in-service teacher training system dates back to the mid-19th century and provides an overview of the unions, societies, congresses, courses, and pedagogical publications that contributed to teacher professional development during that period. It highlights that the experience of Tsarist Russia was expanded by the Soviet system of continuous professional development for teachers (1920s–1990s), noting such new forms as correspondence courses, industrial and cultural excursions, workshops, and internships. The paper provides an overview of the creation of central courses for the professional development of social education workers, teacher training institutes, and dedicated departments for continuing education within educational institutions, demonstrating the forms and directions of their activities. The nature of changes in the continuous education system in the late 20th and first quarter of the 21st centuries is explored, featuring forms such as symposia, seminars, master classes, conferences, mentoring and coaching, professional learning communities, research projects, and projects examining teaching practice. Russian online platforms are examined, as they make continuous teacher development more meaningful, flexible, accessible, and interactive. It is suggested that both hybrid and personalized models of continuous teacher development, with a preference for online courses, will be promising directions, while active learning methods, artificial intelligence, and inclusive education will remain in high demand. It is concluded that continuous teacher development is a significant component of teachers’ professional growth, student success, and the improvement of educational processes in academic institutions.

Keywords: educator, teacher, continuous development, professional development/in-service training, education, online platforms, distance learning courses

62

2026 Pedagogical Review

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU