Pedagogical review
RU EN






Today: 19.09.2026
Home Search
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted article
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
EBSCO
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Search

- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

#SearchDownloads
1

Khoroshikh V.V., Tregubenko I.A., Rokhina E.V., Tuzhikova E.S. Values as a determinant of attitude towards digital technologies among higher school teachers. Pedagogical Review. 2025. Issue 4 (62). P. 104-115

The intensive influence of information technologies on educational practices at all levels of education determines the need to study the value-semantic determinants of attitudes towards digital technologies among higher school teachers. In the course of an empirical study conducted on a sample of teachers of higher education institutions in St. Petersburg (n = 73, 56 of them women and 17 men), the hypothesis of the influence of values and the semantic attitude of openness to experience on the attitude of teachers to digital technologies was tested. The research methods were presented in a short version of Schwartz Value Survey, the “Intelligence” scale from the L. Goldberg questionnaire and author’s questionnaire on the use of digital technologies by higher school teachers. Based on the cluster analysis, groups of teachers with a positive and wary attitude towards digital technologies were identified. It was found that for teachers with a positive attitude to digital technologies, the value of achievement (p

Keywords: values, value orientations, openness to experience, digital technologies, higher school teacher

1089
2

Khoroshikh V.V., Tregubenko I.A., Rokhina E.V., Kosheleva A.N. Motivational resources of higher education teachers in the context of digital transformation. Pedagogical Review. 2026. Issue 4 (68). P. 106-116

The paper presents the results of an empirical study of the motivational resources of higher education teachers in the context of the digital transformation of education. The study involved 292 faculty members from higher education institutions in St. Petersburg. Among the study participants, 77 % were women and 23 % were men, with an average age of 49.5 years. More than 83 % of the participants had more than 10 years of teaching experience. To solve the research problems, the following methods were used: the questionnaire of professional motivation (PD-2) by E.N. Osin, T.O. Gordeeva, the questionnaire of diagnostics of experiences in activity (DPA) by D.A. Leontyev, E.N. Osin, an abbreviated version of the questionnaire of value orientations by S. Schwartz and the author's questionnaire aimed at clarifying the attitude of teachers towards the use of digital technologies in educational activities. Using cluster analysis, two groups of higher education teachers were identified, each with different motivational attitudes toward work: those with autonomous motivation and those with crisis motivation. A comparative analysis of value orientations and attitudes toward digital technologies in these groups revealed significant differences. Higher school teachers with a crisis of professional motivation in values are more focused on enjoying life and satisfying their desires, while they are not inclined to support initiatives for digital transformation in an educational institution. Age, gender, and work experience do not affect the experience of a professional motivational crisis among university teachers. The results of data factorization made it possible to clarify the features of the value-motivational attitude to digital transformations in education in two groups of higher school teachers. Teachers with autonomous motivation perceive digital transformation as a resource for professional self-development and professional achievements. For teachers with crisis motivation, modern digital technologies act as an additional factor in stimulating activity, the possibility of compensating for the experience of emptiness in their professional activities.

Keywords: work motivation, motivational resources, autonomous motivation, motivational crisis, digital technologies, university teachers

111

2026 Pedagogical Review

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU