Pedagogical review
RU EN






Today: 20.09.2026
Home Search
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted article
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
EBSCO
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Search

- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

#SearchDownloads
1

Kashapov M.M., Egorova M.M. The role of teachers' metacognitive resources in preventing obesity as a key component of metabolic syndrome. Pedagogical Review. 2026. Issue 4 (68). P. 117-126

This article examines the role of teacher’s metacognitive resources in obesity prevention as a key component of metabolic syndrome. Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of metabolic and cardiovascular disorders, that includes central obesity, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and arterial hypertension. Its prevalence among educators has reached critical levels: abdominal obesity identified in 40,2% of professionals in this field. Teaching is characterized by high degree of emotional and cognitive load, which triggers a cascade of neuroendocrine reactions leading to visceral fat accumulation and the development of insulin resistance. A systematic analysis of Russian and international studies was conducted to examine the interrelation between teacher’s occupational stress, metabolic disturbances, and metacognitive. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of teacher’s metacognitive resources in metabolic syndrome prevention. It is substantiated that professional thinking resourcefulness, understood as the metacognitive ability to recognize, actualize, and effectively utilize internal and external means for solving professional tasks, serves as protective factor inhibiting metabolic disorder development. A key component of the professional thinking resourcefulness concept is suprasituational thinking, viewed as the teacher’s intellectual ability to transcend the boundaries of a specific problem situation. This capacity reduces affective involvement and mitigates the physiological stress responses. Metacognitive resources, including suprasituational thinking, mindfulness, and metacognitive regulation of eating behavior, act as protective factors against emotion-driven overeating and metabolic disturbances. Empirical data confirms the association between high levels of mindfulness and metacognitive regulation and lower probability of developing metabolic syndrome. The mechanism of bidirectional relationship between metacognition and metabolic health is described: metacognitive ability deficits lead to emotional overeating and obesity, which in turn causes cognitive impairments, forming a vicious cycle: low thinking resourcefulness → insufficient self-regulation → emotional overeating → obesity and metabolic syndrome → cognitive impairments → further decline in metacognitive abilities. Development of teacher’s metacognitive competencies at early stages of professionalization may provide a psychological basis for preventive programs targeting metabolic syndrome, which has significant practical implications for maintaining the occupational health of educators.

Keywords: metacognitive resources, metabolic syndrome, obesity, occupational health of educators, suprasituational thinking, thinking resourcefulness, mindfulness, burnout syndrome, occupational stress

119

2026 Pedagogical Review

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU