SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM IN THE WORKS OF N. LUHMANN IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PROBLEMS OF RUSSIAN EDUCATION
The article analyzes the problems of the modern Russian education during the period of its continuing reform, in particular the loss of one of the most important tools for the formation and development of personality – education. As a result of socio-political, economic and cultural changes in education system education originally abandoned its educational function, but in the present situation of devaluation the recovery of values of education can be seen in a number of priority areas for development. To understand the essence of education analyzes the social and philosophical position of the German philosopher and sociologist Niklas Luhmann, who studied the process of sociocultural evolution of education and interpreted education in his work as a result of the educational system of the society. Education in socialization treated by N. Luhmann as mechanisms of personality changes, but education complements and corrects the results of socialization. Education takes its contingency formula in the concept of “education”, which is understood as the result of N. Luhmann active work of the individual over himself, the symbol of his public success. Pedagogy as a theory of reflection develops its own definition of the educational plan, thereby changing the content of the previous formula of contingency “education”. The educational goal is not designated as the development of scientific knowledge, as well as the acquisition of “ability to learn.” This educational goal orients the individual to explore all that is available for the study, and the need for further lifelong learning in the future. Thus, the concept of Luhmann is radically different from today's traditional ideas that underpin all modern education system in which education is understood as a mere tool of learning and education, moreover is not binding and has no evaluation criteria.
Keywords: education, social and cultural evolution of education, problems of modern education
References:
1. Sotsial'naya fi losofi ya: uchebnik [Social Philosophy: textbook]. Ed. by I. A. Gobozov. Moscow, Izdatel’ S. A. Savin Publ., 2003. 528 p. (in Russian).
2. Luman N. Sotsial'nye sistemy. Ocherk obshchey teorii [Social systems. Essay on the general theory]. Translated from German by I. D. Gazieva; ed. by N. A. Golovin. Saint-Petersberg, Nauka Publ., 2007. 648 p. (in Russian).
3. Rysakova P. I. Kontseptsiya vospitaniya N. Lumana: sistemno-funktsional'nyy podkhod [The concept of education of Luhmann: systemic-functional approach]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya – Case Studies, 2008, no. 2, pp. 141–145 (in Russian). 4. Luhmann N., Lenzen D. (Hg.) Das Erziehungssystem der Gesellschaft. F/M., 2002. 238 S. (in German).
5. Luhmann N. Soziologische Aufklärung. Beitrage zur funktionalen Differenzierung der Gesellschaft. F/M., 1987. 648 S. (in German).
6. Verbitskiy A. A. Lichnostnyy i kompetentnostnyy podkhody v obrazovanii: problemy integratsii [Personal and competence approach in education: problems of integration]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2009. 336 p. (in Russian).
7. Kirillov N. P., Leont'eva E. G. Konkurentnosposobnost' vypusknikov vuzov: problemy i resheniya [Competitiveness of graduates: problems and solutions]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, no. 6 (147), pp. 9–13 (in Russian).
8. Tatur Yu. G. Kompetentnost' v strukture modeli kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov [Competence in the structure of the model quality of training]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye segodnya – Higher Education Today, 2004, no. 3, pp. 20–26 (in Russian).
9. Leont'ev D. A. Psikhologiya svobody: k postanovke problemy samodeterminatsii lichnosti [Psychology of freedom: to the problem of self identity]. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 2000, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 47–52 (in Russian).
10. Gavrilyuk O. A., Volynkina S. V. Issledovaniye tsennostno-smyslovogo komponenta professional'noy avtonomnosti prepodavateley vuzov [The study of value-semantic component of professional autonomy of university teachers]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, no. 6 (147), pp. 53–59 (in Russian).
11. Maksimova Zh. S. Tseli vospitaniya v sovremennoy Rossii: sotsial'noye soderzhaniye v sotsial'nom kontekste [The objectives of education in modern Russia: the social content in a social context]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, no. 5 (146), pp. 18–24 (in Russian).
( 429.64 kB ) 
( 422.66 kB )
Issue: 3, 2015
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: THE PHILOSOPHICAL FUNDAMENTALS OF PEDAGOGY
Pages: 7 — 12
Downloads: 1009