MODEL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TIME OF THE PERSONALITY INCLUDED IN GLOBALIZATION PROCESS (THE STUDY OF STUDENTS)
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2019-5-166-177
The analysis of various approaches to studying the structure and the content of psychological time in psychological science is carried out. The following approaches are considered: field concept of psychological time of K. Levin, motivational and dynamic concept of J. Nuttin, the model of psychological time by V. G. Aseev, causal and target concept of subjective time of E. Golovakh and A. Kronik, the concept of Time Perspective of F. Zimbardo, the concept of personal organization of time of K. A. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya, the concept of relation to time by T. A. Nestik, and others. The results of the empirical check of theoretical model of psychological time based on the Nestik’s concept are presented. For the empirical check of this model the research was conducted on the example of students of various faculties (law, economy, information technologies, management, journalism, Eurasia and East) of the regional Russian university (N = 200, 41 male, 159 female, aged 18–23). In order to identify the structure of interrelations of the components of psychological time the explanatory and confirmatory factorial analyses were used. As a result, the twofactor model which indexes of coherence correspond to the recommended values has been received: χ2 = 15.856, df = 10, p = 0.104, CFI = 0.988, RMSEA = 0.054, GFI = 0.978, PCLOSE = 0.394. According to the model, the structure of psychological time includes cognitive, conative and affective components, and the last is dominating for this sample. The psychological filling of the components are pessimistic: these are negative attitudes towards present, unbalanced time perspective with prevalence of negatively perceived past and fatalistically perceived present, as well as the tendency to procrastination. These tendencies of a negative future perception by students, a lack of the desire to plan events and to set the purposes, unbalanced time perspective, the tendency to procrastination could be a reason of destructive behavior, including various forms of addiction, low level of self-realization, and subjective wellbeing. It is necessary to develop the representation of value and importance of time as a resource in student’s mind, to develop the ability to control it for the purposes achievement, to develop the creative thinking, and understanding of the value of lived events.
Keywords: psychological time, time perception, experience of time, time attitude, time perspective, model of psychological time, structure of psychological time
References:
1. Zabrodin Yu. M., Borozdina L. V., Musina I. A. K metodike otsenki urovnya trevozhnosti po kharakteristikam vremennoy pertseptsii [To the technique of the assessment of anxiety level by characteristics of temporary perception]. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 1989, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 87–95 (in Russian).
2. Kotov-Khromenko V. E. Tipologicheskiye osobennosti vysshey nervnoy deyatel’nosti i vospriyatiye vremeni [Typological features of higher nervous activity and perception of time]. Problemy vospriyatiya prostranstva i vremeni [Problems of perception of space and time]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1961, pp. 163–165 (in Russian).
3. Ponomarev M. F. O vospriyatii vremeni i o tendentsii k prezhdevremennomu ili zapazdyvayushchemu reagirovaniyu [About time perception and a tendency to the premature or late reaction]. Voprosy psihologii – Voprosy Psychologii, 1959, no. 1, pp. 99–102 (in Russian).
4. Sokolova E. T. Vospriyatiye v norme i patologii [Perception in norm and in pathology]. Moscow, MSU Publ., 1976, pp. 63–68 (in Russian).
5. Fress P. Vospriyatiye i otsenka vremeni [Perception and assessment of time]. Fress P., Piaget Z. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental psychology]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1978, vol. 6, pp. 88–135 (in Russian).
6. El’kin D. G. Vospriyatiye vremeni kak modelirovaniye [Time perception as modeling]. Vospriyatiye prostranstva i vremeni [Space and time perception]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1969. Pp. 76–79 (in Russian).
7. Golovakha E. I., Kronik A. L. Psikhologicheskoye vremya lichnosti [Psychological time of a personality]. Kiev, Naukova dumka Publ., 1984. 128 p. (in Russian).
8. Tsukanov B. I. Vremya v psikhike cheloveka [Time in person’s mentality]. Odessa, AstroPrint Publ., 2000, 216 p. (in Russian).
9. Grigorovskaya N. Yu. Osobennosti osoznavayemogo i neosoznavayemogo komponentov lichnostnoy organizatsii vremeni. Avtoref. dis. kand. psikhol. nauk [Features of the realized and extramental components of the personal organization of time. Abstract of thesis. of cand. psychol. sci.]. Moscow, 1999.167 p. (in Russian).
10. Kovalev V. I. Kategoriya vremeni v psikhologii (lichnostnyy aspekt) [Category of time in psychology (personal aspect)]. In: Antsyferova L. I. (ed.). Kategorii materialisticheskoy dialektiki v psikhologii [Categories of materialistic dialectics in psychology]. Moscow, 1988. Pp. 216–230 (in Russian).
11. Nestik T. A. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya determinatsiya gruppovogo otnosheniya k vremeni. Dis. dokt. psikhol. nauk [Social and psychological determination of the group relation to time. Diss. of doct. of psychol. sci.]. Moscow, 2015 (in Russian).
12. Kublitskene L. Yu. Organizatsiya vremeni lichnost’yu kak pokazatel’ eye aktivnosti [Organization of time by a personality as an indicator of activity]. Gumanisticheskiye problemy psikhologicheskoy teorii [Humanistic problems of psychological theory]. Moscow, 1995. Pp. 185–192 (in Russian).
13. Serenkova V. F. Tipologicheskiye osobennosti planirovaniya lichnostnogo vremeni [Typological features of personal time planning]. Gumanisticheskiye problemy psikhologicheskoy teorii [Humanistic problems of psychological theory]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1995. Pp. 192–204 (in Russian).
14. Ulitova E. S. Motivatsionnyy analiz povedeniya lichnosti vo vremennom aspekte. Avtoref. kand. psikhol. nauk [The motivational analysis of behavior of a personality in temporary aspect. Abstract of thesis of cand. psychol. sci.]. Moscow, 1988. 21 p. (in Russian).
15. Boniwell I., Osin E., P. Linley A., Ivanchenko G. V. A question of balance: Time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2010, no. 5:1, pp. 24–40.
16. Frank L. K. Time perspectives. Journal of Social Philosophy, 1939, vol. 4, pp. 293–312.
17. Zimbardo P., Boyd D. Paradoks vremeni. Novaya psikhologiya vremeni, kotoraya uluchshit vashu zhizn’ [Time paradox. New psychology of time which will improve your life]. Saint-Petersburg, Rech Publ., 2010 (in Russian).
18. Syrtsova A. Vozrastnaya dinamika vremennoy perspektivy lichnosti. Dis. kand. psikhol. nauk [Age dynamics of time perspective of a personality. Dis. cand. of psychol. sci.] Moscow, 2008 (in Russian).
19. Shipp A. J., Edwards J.R., Lambert L.S. Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009, vol. 110, pp. 1–22.
20. Holman E. A., Silver R. C. Future-oriented thinking and adjustment in the nationwide longitudinal study following the September 11th terrorist attacks. Motivation and Emotion, 2005, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 389–410.
21. Levin K. Teoriya polya v sotsial’nykh naukakh [Field theory in the social sciences]. Dinamicheskaya psikhologiya [Dynamic psychology]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2001. Pp. 241–242 (in Russian).
22. Nyutten Zh. Motivatsiya, deystviye i perspektiva budushchego [Motivation, action and future perspective]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2004 (in Russian).
23. Hecht T. D., Allen N. J. Exploring links between polychronicity and wellbeing from the perspective of person-job fi t: Does it matter if you prefer to only do one thing at a time? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2005, no. 98, pp. 155–178.
24. Slocombe T. E., Bluedorn A. C. Organizational behavior implications of the congruence between preferred polychronicity and experienced work-unit polychronicity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1999, no. 20, pp. 75–99.
25. Kuzmina O. V. Lichnostnye osobennosti organizatsii vremeni deyatel’nosti. Avtoref. dis. kand. psikhol. nauk [Personal features of the organization of time of activity. Abstract of thesis cand. of psychol. sci.]. Moscow, 1993. 19 p. (in Russian).
26. Aseyev V. G. O modal’nostnoy strukture psikhologicheskogo vremeni. Psikhologiya lichnosti i vremya [About modal structure of psychological time. Personality psychology and time]. Tezisy dokladov i vystupleniy na Vsesoyuznoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Chernovtsy, 22–25 aprelya. 2 ch. [Theses of reports and speeches at the All-Union Scientifi c Conference. Chernivtsi, April 22–25, 1991. 2 parts]. 1991, pp. 24–26 (in Russian).
27. Abul’khanova K. A., Berezina T. N. Vremya lichnosti i vremya zhizni [Time of a personality and time of life]. Saint-Petersburg, Aleteya Publ., 2001, 304 p. (in Russian).
28. Jacoby J., Szybillo G., Berning C. Time and consumer behavior: An interdisciplinary overview. Journal of Consumer Research, 1976, no. 2, pp. 320–339.
29. Zabelina E. V., Smirnov M. G., Chestyunina Yu. V. Psikhologicheskoye vremya lichnosti v usloviyakh globalizatsii: postanovka problemy [Psychological time of a personality in the conditions of globalization: the statement of the problem]. Universum: psikhologiya i obrazovaniye, 2016, no. 9 (27) (in Russian). URL: http://7universum.com/ru/psy/archive/item/3607 (accessed 28 September 2016).
30. Ortuno V. E. C., Janeiro I. N., Paixao, M.,P., Esteves C., Cordeiro P. A New Multidimensional Model of Time Perspective. Revista iberoamericana de diagnostico y evaluacion-e avaliacao psicologica, 2017, T. 3, vol. 45, pp. 71–84.
31. Bredun E. V., Krasnoryadtseva O. M., Shcheglova E. A. Tipologicheskiye osobennosti sub’’yektivnogo vospriyatiya vremeni v kontekste khronotopicheskoy zhizni cheloveka [Typological features of subjective time perception in the context of chronotopical human life]. Sibirskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2018, vol. 68, pp. 32–45. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/68/2 (in Russian).
32. Zinchenko V. P. Vremya – deystvuyushcheye litso [Time is a character] Voprosy psikhologii – Voprosy Psychologii, 2001, no. 6, pp. 36–54 (in Russian).
33. Furey J. T., Fortunato V. J. The Theory of MindTime. Cosmology, 2014, vol. 18, pp. 119–130
34. Tulving E. How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 1985, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 385–398.
35. Varvaricheva Ya. I. Fenomen prokrastinatsii: problemy i perspektivy issledovaniya [Procrastination phenomenon: research problems and perspectives]. Voprosy psikhologii – Voprosy Psychologii, 2010, no. 3, pp. 121–130 (in Russian).
36. Vasil’kovskaya M. I. Molodezh’ v kontekste global’nykh problem razvitiya mirovogo soobshchestva [Youth in the context of global problems of the development of international community]. Vserossiyskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya online-konferentsiya “Dialog kul’tur: globalizatsiya, traditsii i tolerantnost’” [Russian national scientifi c and practical online conference Dialogue of Cultures: Globalization, Traditions and Tolerance: collection of articles]. Kemerovo, 2009. Pp. 308–317 (in Russian).
37. Gurevich P. S., Spirova E. M. Identichnost’ kak sotsial’nyy i antropologicheskiy fenomen [Identity as a social and anthropological phenomenon]. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2015. 368 p. (in Russian).
( 845.66 kB ) 
( 738.66 kB )
Issue: 5, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: ISSUES OF PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 166 — 177
Downloads: 1357