THE DEVALUATION OF HUMANITARIAN KNOWLEDGE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: WAYS TO OVERCOME THE CRISIS
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2020-2-161-171
The article considers the problems of the crisis of humanitarian knowledge in higher education. This crisis is accompanied by an increase in the pragmatic motives of professional choice, when obtaining education is reduced to achieving material well-being or career growth. An alarming trend is the dehumanization of education. At the same time, the prospects for higher education development are inseparable from the notions of the priority of humanitarian knowledge due to its fundamental nature. The authors prove the position that the content of education should include everything that leads to the understanding of higher education as a process of creating cultural values, including spiritual, moral, aesthetic, material values. The study highlighted a number of features that modern teaching methods of the humanities should answer in universities. These signs are summarized in the article. The study also highlighted the principles necessary for the selection and structuring of the content of humanitarian education (the principle of historicism, etc.). Performance indicators for the development of humanitarian knowledge are also presented. It is concluded that the development of humanitarian knowledge provides ample opportunities for comprehensive and productive communication with the outside world and creative practical work.
Keywords: higher education, humanitarian knowledge, the content of education, principles of development, teaching methods, educational environment, student, educational dialogue
References:
1. Levada Yu. A. Pokoleniya XX veka: vozmozhnosti issledovaniya [Generations of the twentieth century: research opportunities]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nye peremeny – Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2001, no. 5 (55), pp. 7–14 (in Russian).
2. Gorbunov V. I., Evdokimova O. K., Lyapayeva L. V. Intelligentnost’ studentov regional’nogo tekhnicheskogo vuza: postanovka voprosa, sredstva otsenivaniya, probnye rezul’taty [Intelligence of regional technical institute students: posing the problem, means of evaluation, trial results]. Vestnik Chuvashskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. I. Ya. Yakovleva, 2016, no. 1 (89), pp. 82–90 (in Russian).
3. Andreyev A. L. Kul’turnye predpochteniya sovremennogo rossiyskogo studenchestva [Cultural preferences of modern Russian students]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nye peremeny – Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2008, no. 2 (86), pp. 107–117 (in Russian).
4. Bekkerman P. B. Neobkhodimost’ tvorcheskogo razvitiya podrostkov v dopolnitel’nom obrazovanii: osnovnye prichiny v kontekste psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh vozzreniy D. I. Fel’dshteyna [The need for creative development of adolescents in additional education: the main reasons in the context of psychological and pedagogical views of D.I. Feldstein]. Gumanitarnoye prostranstvo. Mezhdunarodnyy al’manakh – Humanitarian space. International almanac, 2018, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 50–55 (in Russian).
5. Andreyev A. L. Kul’turnye predpochteniya sovremennogo rossiyskogo studenchestva [Cultural preferences of modern Russian students]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nye peremeny – Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2008, no. 2 (86), pp. 107–117 (in Russian).
6. Bakhtin M. M. Problemy poetiki Dostoyevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics]. Moscow, Sovetskaya Rossiya Publ., 1979. 320 p. (in Russian).
7. Lazarev M. A., Podvoysky V. P., Stukalova O. V. Pedagogicheskoye obespecheniye preodoleniya sotsial’noy indifferentnosti studentov gumanitarnykh vuzuv: sotsio-kul’turnyy podkhod. Pod obshch. red. V. P. Podvoyskogo [Pedagogical support for overcoming the social indifference of students of humanitarian universities: a socio-cultural approach. Ed. V. P. Podvoysky]. Moscow, International Academy of Education Publ., Daugavpils, University of Daugavpils Publ., 2016. 152 p. (in Russian).
8. Lyubimov L. Reforma obrazovaniya: blagiye namereniya, obreteniya, poteri (Chto zhe delat’ s “luchshim v mire” obrazovaniyem?) [Education reform: good intentions, gain, loss (What to do with the “best in the world” education?)] (in Russian). URL: http://hse.ru/pressa2002/ default.php? show=8970&selected=140&PHPSESSID=631fb320634c8fd278345c20eb0b0e94
9. Gadamer G. G. Aktual’nost’ prekrasnogo (per. s nem.). Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1991. 368 p. (in Russian).
10. Kondaurova O. P. Problemy prepodavaniya sotsial’no-gumanitarnykh distsiplin v vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniyakh [Issues of teaching social studies in institutions of higher education]. Vestnik VGU – Proceedings of VSU, 2017, no. 4, pp. 79–88 (in Russian).
11. Maslow A. Self-actualizing and Beyond. In: Challenges of Humanistic Psychology. N. Y., 1967. Pp. 279–286.
12. Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1986. 445 p. (in Russian).
13. Maslow A. Self-actualizing and Beyond. In: Challenges of Humanistic Psychology. N. Y., 1967. Pp. 279–286.
14. Bibler V. S. Ot naukonaucheniya – k logike kul’tury. Dva filosofskikh vvedeniya v dvadtsat’ pervyy vek [From science to the logic of culture. Two philosophical introductions to the twenty-first century]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1990. 413 p. (in Russian).
15. Frolov I. T. Vzaimodeystviye nauk i gumanisticheskiye tsennosti [The interaction of sciences and humanistic values]. Nauka i kul’tura. Otv. red. V. ZH. Kelle [Science and Culture. Responsible Editor V. Zh. Kelle]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984. Pp. 317–335 (in Russian).
16. Gusserl’ E. Filosofiya kak strogaya nauka [Philosophy as a rigorous science]. Novocherkassk, Saguna Publ., 1994. 357 p. (in Russian).
17. Yusov B. P. Vzaimosvyaz’ kul’turogennykh faktorov v formirovanii sovremennogo khudozhestvennogo myshleniya uchitelya obrazovatel’noy oblasti “Iskusstvo” [The relationship of cultural factors in the formation of modern artistic thinking of the teacher of the educational field “Art”]. Moscow, Kompaniya Sputnik+ Publ., 2004. 252 p. (in Russian).
Issue: 2, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: INNOVATIVE PROCESSES IN EDUCATION
Pages: 161 — 171
Downloads: 895