CONTINUITY OF PRESCHOOL AND ELEMENTARY EDUCATION THROUGH THE USE OF PROJECT ACTIVITY
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2020-3-9-15
The author considers the issue of the implementation of the continuity of preschool and primary education. Continuity is understood as the interaction between different levels of education. This interaction provides the development of children, enriching their knowledge and experience. It is based on taking into account the specifics of age, the leading type of activity, on the use of appropriate, effective for each situation means, methods, forms of pedagogical activity. The continuity of methods and means is aimed at establishing a smooth phased formation of the child’s learning activities and moving him from one educational level to another. The author analyzes the standards of preschool and primary general education from the perspective of the implementation of continuity. The analysis showed similarities in goals, in a theoretical and methodological basis (system-activity approach), in the structure, which allows us to determine the consistency of the content and methods of its implementation at the levels of preschool and primary education. An important mechanism of continuity is the search for cross-cutting, that is, relevant for different levels of education, technologies and methods. This requirement meets the project, which the author presents as an integrative activity, combining game, research, creative activities. The researcher presents the special results of the implementation of project activities in each age group and their relationship.
Keywords: continuity of preschool and primary education, design activities of preschool children, design activities of primary school children
References:
1. Trubaychuk L. V. Pedagogicheskaya strategiya i taktika organizatsii integrirovannogo protsessa v doshkol’nom obrazovanii [Pedagogical strategy and tactics of organizing an integrated process in preschool education]. Moscow, Knizhnaya palata Publ., 2013. 173 p. (in Russian).
2. Asmolov A. G. Psikhologiya individual’nosti. Metodologicheskiye osnovy razvitiya lichnosti v istoriko-evolyutsionnom protsesse [Psychology of individuality. Methodological foundations of personality development in the historical evolutionary process]. Moscow, MSU Publ., 1996. 96 p. (in Russian).
3. Prikaz Minobrnauki Rossii ot 17.10.2013 N 1155 (red. ot 21.01.2019) «Ob utverzhdenii federal’nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel’nogo standarta doshkol’nogo obrazovaniya» [Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated 10.17.2013 N 1155 (as amended on 01.21.2019) “On the approval of the federal state educational standard for preschool education”]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_154637/ (accessed 6 December 2019).
4. Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart nachal’nogo obshchego obrazovaniya. Standarty vtorogo pokoleniya [The federal state educational standard of elementary general education. Second Generation Standards]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 2011.33 p. (in Russian).
5. Yeflova Z. B., Kosolapova Ye. S. Usloviya obespecheniya preyemstvennosti doshkol’nogo i nachal’nogo obshchego obrazovaniya v standartakh obrazovaniya i v pedagogicheskoy praktike [Conditions for ensuring the continuity of preschool and primary general education in education standards and in teaching practice]. Nepreryvnoye obrazovaniye: XXI vek – Lifelong Education: the XXI century, 2018, vol. 1 (21), pp. 2–10 (in Russian).
6. Smoleusova T. V. FGOS doshkol’nogo obrazovaniya: glavnoye v strukture, soderzhanii, preyemstvennosti [FSES of preschool education: the main thing in structure, content, continuity]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – NSPU Bulletin, 2015, vol. 1 (23), pp. 7–17 (in Russian).
7. Tarasova N. V., Pastukhova I. P., Chigrina S. G. Preyemstvennost’ pedagogicheskikh tekhnologiy kak usloviye realizatsii federal’nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel’nogo standarta obshchego obrazovaniya [Continuity of pedagogical technologies as a condition for implementing the federal state educational standard of general education]. Pedagogicheskiy IMIDZH, 2017, vol. 3 (36), pp. 27–34 (in Russian).
8. Veraksa N. Ye. Organizatsiya proyektnoy deyatel’nosti v detskom sadu [Organization of project activities in kindergarten]. Sovremennoye doshkol’noye obrazovaniye: teoriya i praktika – Preschool Education Today: Theory and Practice, 2008, vol. 2, pp. 16–20 (in Russian).
9. Tokareva T. A. Izmeneniye soderzhaniya obrazovatel’noy deyatel’nosti v usloviyakh novogo federal’nogo gosudarstvennogo standarta doshkol’nogo obrazovaniya [Changing of educational activity in conditions of the new federal state standard for preschool education]. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoye obozreniye – Pedagogical Review, 2016, vol. 2 (12), pp. 118–123 (in Russian).
10. Semenova N. A. Voprosy organizatsii proyektnoy deyatel’nosti v nachal’noy shkole [The questions of the organization of the project activity in primary school]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2012, vol. 11 (126), pp. 209–211 (in Russian).
11. Ryumina Yu. N. Organizatsiya proyektnoy deyatel’nosti doshkol’nikov [Organization of design activities of preschoolers]. Vestnik Shadrinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Journal of Shadrinsk State Pedagogical University, 2016, vol. 1 (29), pp. 52–58 (in Russian).
12. Semenova N. A. Proyektnaya deyatel’nost’ mladshikh shkol’nikov v urochnoye vremya [Project activity of younger students at the appointed time]. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoye obozreniye – Pedagogical Review, 2013, vol. 1 (1), pp. 70–74 (in Russian).
( 374.21 kB ) 
( 366.14 kB )
Issue: 3, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: GENERAL EDUCATION
Pages: 9 — 15
Downloads: 881