COPING STRATEGIES PREFERRED BY RUSSIAN SCHOOL TEACHERS IN ONLINE LEARNING
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2022-4-197-211
The study of Coping strategies preferred by Russian school teachers in online learning during the first half of the pandemic 2020 is based on the responses of 554 teachers participating in the all-Russian anonymous survey. The transition to online learning is qualified as a complex stressor of integrated nature that includes technological and human factors. The survey identified six groups of frustration factors in online learning: decreased motivation and academic performance of school students (decreased learning efficiency), communication difficulties between a teacher and a student / parent (communicative frustration), digital illiteracy, lack of equipment for online education and technical failures, increased volume and time of work as well as health and private life problems. The survey also revealed five types of coping strategies used by educators to overcome these frustration factors: time management and building boundaries, mastering online competencies and platforms (mastering new technologies and forms of activities), fixating on frustration and negative experiences associated with it, application of anti-stress practices, seeking for social support and understanding (empathy as a means of stress release). The study shows statistically significant dependence of the chosen coping strategy on the subjective significance of certain aspects of professional and pedagogical activities, describes adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies to deal with the stressor of online learning transition; highlights the main difficulties in the transition to online learning, presents teachers’ evaluation of the difficulties set before them by the transition to online learning and of their professional burnout.
Keywords: teachers, pandemic, transition to online learning, stressor, coping strategies, frustration factors of online learning
References:
1. Rasskazova E. I., Leontiev D. A., Lebedeva A. A. Pandemiya kak vyzov sub’’yektnomu blagopoluchiyu [Pandemic as a challenge to subjective wellbeing]. Consultatsionnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya – Counselling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2020, part 28, no. 2, pp. 90–108 (in Russian).
2. Borisova M. V. Psikhologicheskiye determinanty psikhicheskogo vygoraniya u pedagogov. Dis. kand. psikhol. nauk [Psychological determinants of mental burnout among teachers. Diss. of cand. psychol. sci.]. Yaroslavl, 2003. 190 p. (in Russian).
3. Korytova G. S. Zashchitno-sovladayushcheye povedeniye sub’’yekta professional’no-pedagogicheskoy deyatel’nosti. Avtoref. dis. dokt. psikhol. nauk [Protective coping behaviour of the subject of professional pedagogical activity. Abstract of thesis of doc. psychol. sci]. Irkutsk, 2007. 533 p. (in Russian).
4. Mitina L. M., Asmakovets E. S. Emotsional’naya gibkost’ uchitelya: psikhologicheskoye soderzhaniye, diagnostika, korrektsiya [Emotional flexibility of the teacher: psychological content, diagnostics, correction]. Moscow, Moscow Psychological and Social Institute Publ.; Flinta Publ., 2001. 192 p. (in Russian).
5. Pecherkina A. A., Sinyakova M. G., Churakova N. I. Proffesional’noye zdorov’ye pedagoga: uchebnoye posobiye dlya bakalavriata [Professional health of a teacher: a textbook for an academic bachelor’s degree]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2018. 136 p. (in Russian).
6. Sinichkina N. E. Mezhpokolencheskiy dialog pedagogov i nastavnichestvo [Educators’ intergenerational dialogue and mentoring]. Nastavnichestvo v shkol’nom obrazovanii: materialy I Shlissel’burgskikh pedagogicheskikh chteniy, 28 marta 2019 g.; sostavitel’ i otvetstvennyy redaktor N. E. Sinichkina [Mentoring in school education: materials of the I Shlisselburg Pedagogical Readings, March 28, 2019; compiler and editor in chief N. E. Sinichkina]. Saint Petersburg, SINEL Publ., 2019. Pp. 10–29 (in Russian). URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ICheyggQUUSEAxbms6T2zTZjotOGy0By/view (accessed 4 April 2022).
7. Shkurko O. V., Fedyayeva E. V. Kakiye problemy vskryl vynuzhdennyy perekhod na distantsionnoye obucheniye: o komp’yuterakh i pedagogicheskoy kompetentsii [What problems were revealed by the forced transition to distance learning: about computers and pedagogical computer competence]. Problemy upravleniya kachestvom obrazovaniya: sbornik izbrannykh statey mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Problems of quality management in education: a collection of selected articles of the International scientific and methodological conference]. Saint Petersburg, 2020. Pp. 107–111 (in Russian).
8. Petrakova A. V., Kanonir T. N., Kulikova A. A., Orel E. A. Osobennosti psikhologicheskogo stressa u uchiteley v usloviyakh distantsionnogo prepodavaniya vo vremya pandemii COVID-19 [Features of psychological stress among teachers in the context of distance teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic]. Voprosy obrazovaniya – Education Issues, 2021, no. 1, pp. 93–114 (in Russian).
9. Leonidova G. V., Valiakhmetov R. M., Baymurzina G. R., Babich L. V. Problemy i perspektivy distantsionnogo obucheniya v otsenkakh uchiteley i roditeley obuchayushchichsya [Problems and prospects of distance learning in the assessments of teachers and parents of students]. Economicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny – Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast, 2020, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 202–219 (in Russian).
10. Isayeva N., Kasprzhak A., Kobtseva A., Tsatryan M. COVID-19: ucheniye i obucheniye glazami roditeley [COVID-19: teaching and learning through the eyes of parents]. Obrazovatel’naya politika – Educational Policy, 2020, no. 3 (83), pp. 46–58 (in Russian).
11. Volkov S. Distantsionnoye obucheniye tol’ko navredit detyam: kak spravit’sya s neizbezhnymi minusami udalyonki [Distance learning will only harm children: how to cope with the inevitable disadvantages of distance learning]. Yandex.Dzen, October 27, 2021 (in Russian). URL: https://zen.yandex.ru/media/lupus/distancionnoe-obuchenietolko-navredit-detiam-kak-spravitsia-s-neizbejnymi-minusami-udalenki-61790b040b66de19a8d8e77f?fbclid=IwAR1x7hkwN2zUtR_sGn1Tmgo1ZL6DTkcx8K8Gyr12zm-DSOGAXIg3lj3kzBU (accessed 5 April 2022).
12. Lazarus R. S. Psychological stress and the coping process. N.Y., McGraw-Hill, 1966. 257 p.
13. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. Coping behaviour v sisteme ponyatiy psikhologii lichnosti [Coping behaviour in the system of concepts of personality psychology]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 1997, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 3–20 (in Russian).
14. Kolomeytsev Yu. A., Korzun S. A. Osnovnyye nauchnyye podkhody k koping-povedeniyu (sovladayushchemu povedeniyu) [Basic scientific approaches to coping behaviour (coping behaviour)]. Problemy upravleniya – Control problems, 2010, no. 2 (35), pp. 226–229 (in Russian).
15. Mel’nikova M. L. Psichologiya stressa: teoriya i praktika: uchebno-metodicheskoye posobiye [Psychology of stress: theory and practice: teaching aid]. Ekaterinburg, 2018 (in Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36519262 (accessed 17 April 2022).
16. Lasarus R., Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. New York, Springer, 1984. 445 p.
17. Molokoyedov A. V., Slobodchikov I. M., Udovik S. V. Emotsional’noye vygoraniye v proffesional’noy deyatel’nosti [Emotional burnout in professional activities]. Moscow, Lev’’ Publ., 2018. 252 p. (in Russian).
18. Leontiev A. N. Deyatel’nost’. Soznaniye. Lichnost’ [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1975 (in Russian). URL: http://www.psy.msu.ru/people/leontiev/dsl/index.html (accessed 6 April 2022).
19. Al’perovich V. D. Koping-strategii sub’’yekta v svyazi s obrazami trudnoy zhiznennoy situatsii v metaforakh i sotsial’noy frustrirovannost’yu [Coping strategies of the subject in connection with images of a difficult life situation in metaphors and social frustration]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya – Experimental Psychology, 2020, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 143–155 (in Russian).
20. Goleman D. S chego nachinayetsya lider [Where does the leader begin]. Emotsional’nyy intellekt. Perevod s angliyskogo [Emotional intelligence: Translated from English]. Moscow, Al’pina Publisher Publ., 2016. Pp. 7–31 (in Russian).
21. Problemy perekhoda na distantsionnoye obucheniye v Rossiyskoy Federatsii glazami uchiteley [Problems of transition to distance learning in the Russian Federation through the eyes of teachers]. Laboratoriya mediakommunikatsii v obrazovanii NIU VSHE [Laboratory of media communications in education, Higher School of Economics] (in Russian). URL: https://ioe.hse.ru/fao_distant (accessed 4 April 2022).
( 840.58 kB ) 
( 711.44 kB )
Issue: 4, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY
Pages: 197 — 211
Downloads: 530