Search
Warning: Undefined array key "7039/" in /web/zanos/classes/Edit/EditForm_class.php on line 263
Warning: Undefined array key "7039/" in /web/zanos/classes/Player/SearchArticle_class.php on line 261
Warning: Undefined array key "7039/" in /web/zanos/classes/Player/SearchArticle_class.php on line 261
# | Search | Downloads | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | The article deals with issues of the experimental work results on checking the effectiveness and efficiency of the philology students’ language personality development of the structural and functional model on the basis of the interdisciplinary approach. The purpose, objectives and methods of research on the philology students’ language personality development on the basis of the interdisciplinary approach are described. The structural-functional model including the target, theoretical-methodical, procedural-content and evaluative-effective blocks is briefly presented and described. The content of the concept of “linguistic personality of a philology student” is given and the main components of the linguistic personality of philology students, which are the criteria for its formation, are identified: cognitive, motivational-value, emotional, behavioral. Pedagogical experiment was carried out in three stages: ascertaining, forming, control. The pedagogical experiment study involved 80 first year philology students of Sevastopol State University. The certain tasks of each stage of the experiment are consistently described in the article. The diagnostic tools for each criteria components formation of the philology students’ language personality are described in the article. The author presents the dynamics of changes in the levels of components formation of the philology students’ language personality at various stages of the experiment. The obtained results in all groups at the beginning and at the end were processed using statistical methods: Mann-Whitney Utest, Spearman’s rank correlation, Wilcoxon’s T-test. The effectiveness and efficiency of the philology students’ language personality development of the structural and functional model in the educational process are confirmed by the results of the control section in the experimental group presented in the article. Keywords: philology students’ language personality, interdisciplinary approach, structural and functional model, experimental work, diagnostic tools, statistical methods, dynamics and effectiveness of the model | 418 | ||||
2 | As the title implies the article deals with the experience of using a point-rating system for evaluating the results of students’ educational achievements in Sevastopol State University. Conducted survey is presented on the example of the discipline “Business communication in Russian language”. The article goes into detail about the specifics of implementing the point-rating system for assessing the results of students’ educational achievements at Sevastopol State University using the example of the discipline “Business Communication in Russian”. The purpose of the article is to present the experience of using a point-rating system to evaluate the results of students’ educational achievements and to study the attitude of students towards the use of a point-rating system at a university. The text provides valuable information about the practical significance of the study, which presents an example of a rating system that includes a list of additional rating tasks. The results obtained can be used by university teachers to improve the point-rating system in a number of other communication disciplines. Experimental data that presented the opinions of Sevastopol State University students regarding the use of the point-rating system in the educational process is analyzed. This data was obtained in the course of an empirical study, the advantages and problems of using the system were identified. Conclusions are drawn about the need to improve and develop the system with an emphasis on the content and methodological components. Keywords: point-rating system, evaluation of the results of educational achievements, rating, training course, assessment tools, current certification, questioning | 332 |